H. Con. Res. 230 (110th)Bill Overview

Support Breast Cancer Awareness Month

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Breast cancerCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Oct 10, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement by Congress supporting Breast Cancer Awareness Month. It expresses Congress's intent to promote education on monthly breast self-exams and annual mammograms and to salute survivors and organizations. Because it is a concurrent resolution, it records the position of both chambers but does not create law or require Presidential approval.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law. This measure is symbolic and encourages action by organizations and health practitioners without creating legal obligations.

This concurrent resolution expresses Congressional support for observing Breast Cancer Awareness Month.

It praises survivors and organizations, highlights early detection through monthly self-exams and annual mammograms, and urges health practitioners and organizations to promote breast cancer awareness and screening.

Passage85/100

Content is symbolic, narrow, and historically easy to adopt; concurrent resolution adoption likely, though it does not create binding law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate declaratory language to support observance and encourage awareness activities, while omitting implementation, fiscal, and oversight detail that are not expected or required for this type of measure.

Contention8/100

Liberty vs. equity: liberals want access focus; conservatives prefer voluntary approaches

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay increase public awareness of breast cancer, potentially prompting earlier diagnosis and higher survival rates.
  • Potential benefitEncourages health practitioners to promote monthly self-exams and annual mammograms, reinforcing preventive screening p…
  • Potential benefitRecognizes survivors and volunteers, which may boost morale and public support for patient services.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNonbinding resolution does not allocate funds or change legal authority, limiting concrete policy or program effects.
  • Potential burdenPublic focus on self-exams may conflict with evidence-based screening guidelines about their effectiveness.
  • Potential burdenMay encourage over-screening and follow-up procedures, increasing healthcare costs and false-positive harms.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty vs. equity: liberals want access focus; conservatives prefer voluntary approaches
Progressive95%

Likely supportive because it elevates public health, honors survivors, and encourages screening.

Would welcome awareness efforts but note missing policy steps on equitable access and funding for screening and treatment.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable because the resolution is symbolic and nonbinding and promotes health education.

Would caution that recommendations should align with current clinical evidence and avoid implying one-size-fits-all medical advice.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive because it honors survivors and promotes personal preventive measures.

May note the resolution is nonregulatory and appropriate for congressional recognition, while preferring voluntary, charity-driven responses.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Content is symbolic, narrow, and historically easy to adopt; concurrent resolution adoption likely, though it does not create binding law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Committee scheduling or backlog could delay consideration
  • Any procedural holds or unanimous consent objections in the Senate
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty vs. equity: liberals want access focus; conservatives prefer voluntary approaches

Content is symbolic, narrow, and historically easy to adopt; concurrent resolution adoption likely, though it does not create binding law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly states its purpose and uses appropriate declaratory language to support observance and encourage…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis