Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
This resolution is a non-binding statement by both chambers of Congress saying that confidentiality requirements for minors in Title X and Medicaid should be removed. It does not change current law, regulations, or funding and does not force states or federal agencies to act. Instead, it expresses Congresss opinion and can be used to encourage future legislation or administrative changes.
Concurrent resolutions must be adopted by both the House and Senate but are not sent to the President and do not create binding law.
This concurrent resolution states that confidentiality protections for minors should be removed from family planning programs operating under Title X and Medicaid.
It cites Carey v.
Population Services International and Texas practice, arguing parental consent requirements should apply.
As a sense of Congress, the measure is non‑binding and cannot itself create law; adoption by both chambers remains uncertain given controversy.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly communicates a policy position and situates that position with references to relevant statutes and a court decision, but it provides no mechanisms, implementation plan, fiscal analysis, or accountability measures—features that are not required for a non‑binding concurrent resolution.
Privacy vs parental authority over minors' sexual health
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Privacy vs parental authority over minors' sexual health
Likely opposed.
They would argue removing confidentiality will deter minors from obtaining contraception and sexual health services.
They view confidential access as essential to reducing teen pregnancy and protecting abused or LGBTQ youth.
Cautiously mixed.
They recognize parental involvement's value but worry about public health tradeoffs.
They see the resolution as advisory and would favor evidence, targeted exceptions, and state-level flexibility rather than a blanket federal change.
Generally supportive.
They would emphasize parental rights, the need for parental consent for minors, and concerns about agencies providing contraception without parental knowledge.
They view the resolution as a rightful statement aligning federal programs with parental authority.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a sense of Congress, the measure is non‑binding and cannot itself create law; adoption by both chambers remains uncertain given controversy.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy vs parental authority over minors' sexual health
As a sense of Congress, the measure is non‑binding and cannot itself create law; adoption by both chambers remains uncertain given controve…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly communicates a policy position and situates that position with references to relevant statutes and a court decision, but it provides no mechanisms, implementa…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.