H. Con. Res. 27 (110th)Bill Overview

Recognize James Brown as American Music Icon

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Arts, Culture, ReligionCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 10, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House's view that James Brown should be recognized as an American cultural icon. As a concurrent resolution of recognition, it is a formal, ceremonial statement and does not create law, change federal policy, or impose obligations. Concurrent resolutions are not sent to the President and generally record Congress's opinion or honor individuals or events.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are typically adopted by both the House and Senate and are not presented to the President; they do not have the force of law. This resolution is a non-binding, honorary statement rather than a legal or regulatory action.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of the House that James Brown should be recognized for his contributions to American music and culture.

It lists biographical facts, musical achievements, awards, civil rights-era songs, business activities, and the establishment of a music education foundation.

The resolution is symbolic and nonbinding, offering formal recognition of Brown as an American cultural icon.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution expressing a sense of Congress, it is non‑binding and does not become law even if adopted; adoption likelihood is high but legal enactment is effectively impossible.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides supporting biographical context. It uses the normal vehicle of a "sense of Congress" declaration and contains the level of detail typical for such symbolic measures.

Contention15/100

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFormally honors James Brown and raises public awareness of his musical and cultural legacy.
  • Potential benefitHighlights and may encourage support for arts education and music scholarship efforts.
  • Local governmentsCould modestly increase visitation to memorial sites and related cultural venues, boosting local spending.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and creates no binding legal, budgetary, or regulatory effects.
  • Potential burdenUses legislative time for ceremonial recognition rather than substantive policy debate or lawmaking.
  • Potential burdenMay contribute to a precedent of frequent honorary resolutions, diluting congressional focus and significance.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation benefits.
Progressive100%

Likely welcomes the resolution as appropriate recognition of James Brown’s artistic and civil rights contributions.

Views the mention of "Say It Loud — I'm Black and I'm Proud" and education advocacy positively.

Sees symbolic recognition as valuable for cultural representation, while noting it does not replace policy action on education or inequality.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Sees the resolution as a low-cost, noncontroversial tribute to a widely admired entertainer.

Appreciates bipartisan potential and emphasis on entrepreneurship and education.

Notes it is purely symbolic and should not consume excessive legislative time.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Likely to support honoring James Brown as an influential entertainer and entrepreneur while preferring restrained, achievement-focused language.

May be wary of emphasizing political activism over cultural accomplishments.

Generally views the resolution as an acceptable, symbolic recognition.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution expressing a sense of Congress, it is non‑binding and does not become law even if adopted; adoption likelihood is high but legal enactment is effectively impossible.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will take up or agree to the concurrent resolution
  • Possible procedural holds or objections delaying floor consideration
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation benefits.

As a concurrent resolution expressing a sense of Congress, it is non‑binding and does not become law even if adopted; adoption likelihood i…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides supporting biographical context. It uses the normal vehicle of a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis