H. Con. Res. 30 (110th)Bill Overview

National Stalking Awareness Month, January 2007

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jan 11, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement by Congress that designates January 2007 as National Stalking Awareness Month and encourages awareness and prevention of stalking. It expresses the sense of Congress and urges national and community organizations, businesses, and the media to promote awareness and services for stalking victims. Because it is a concurrent resolution, it does not create law or require the President's signature.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law. They are used to express Congress's view or to coordinate actions between the two chambers.

This concurrent resolution designates January 2007 as National Stalking Awareness Month.

It lists findings about stalking prevalence and harms, urges improved criminal justice response, and encourages national, community, private sector, and media promotion of stalking awareness.

The resolution is symbolic and does not appropriate funds or create new legal obligations.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption by both chambers is likely but cannot create binding law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states the issue, designates January 2007 as National Stalking Awareness Month, and urges relevant actors to promote awareness. It does not create legal obligations, appropriate funds, or establish new procedures, and it contains minimal implementation or accountability detail—conforming to the norms of a symbolic/congratulatory legislative instrument.

Contention10/100

Support across spectrum, but liberals push for funding and equity focus

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could lead to higher reporting and earlier intervention for stalking victims.
  • Potential benefitEncouraging coordination may improve law enforcement and prosecutor responses to stalking cases.
  • Potential benefitNonprofits and private sector groups may develop victim services, training, and prevention programs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesThe resolution is symbolic and creates no federal funding, mandates, or enforceable obligations.
  • Potential burdenMeasurable reductions in stalking are unlikely without dedicated funding and sustained program implementation.
  • Potential burdenIncreased reporting produced by awareness efforts could temporarily raise official incident statistics.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Support across spectrum, but liberals push for funding and equity focus
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: praises victim-centered focus, attention to cyber-stalking, and calls for better criminal justice responses.

Would note the need for funding and attention to marginalized victims.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable: endorses awareness and stronger responses while seeking measurable goals and fiscal prudence.

Views it as a low-cost, bipartisan initiative, but wants clarity on outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely supportive in principle for victim protection and awareness, but cautious about federal symbolism, potential mission creep, and privacy or due-process implications of cyber-surveillance language.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption by both chambers is likely but cannot create binding law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate considers a companion resolution
  • Availability of floor time and unanimous-consent clearance
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Support across spectrum, but liberals push for funding and equity focus

As a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption by both chambers is likely but cannot create binding law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states the issue, designates January 2007 as National Stalking Awareness Month, and urges relevant…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis