Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
This resolution directs the Architect of the Capitol to install, within 30 days of adoption, an honorific plaque on the western front of the United States Capitol listing the names of law enforcement officers and protective entities who responded to the January 6, 2021 violence. It is a concurrent resolution that instructs a congressional official to take a specific action related to the Capitol grounds. Concurrent resolutions are internal to Congress and do not create law or require the President's signature, but they can direct how the legislative branch manages its property and operations.
Concurrent resolutions must be adopted by both the House and the Senate and are not presented to the President. They do not have the force of law but are used to set Congresss internal instructions or manage legislative branch operations.
The concurrent resolution directs the Architect of the Capitol to install, within 30 days of adoption, a permanent honorific plaque on the Capitol's western front listing names of all officers and protective personnel who responded to the January 6, 2021 violence.
It specifies inclusion of United States Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department (DC), and other federal, state, and local responding agencies.
By content this is a narrow, symbolic measure with low cost and broad appeal; historically similar memorial measures pass both chambers easily. Note: as a concurrent resolution it is not submitted to the President and does not create statutory law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped commemorative directive that identifies the responsible party, location, and a 30-day installation deadline, and it references existing legal authority for such installations.
Progressives worry about memorializing police without accountability context
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives worry about memorializing police without accountability context
Generally supportive of honoring individuals who defended the Capitol and protected democratic institutions, while cautious about uncritical law-enforcement memorialization.
May seek assurances the plaque does not erase accountability or broader public-safety concerns.
Likely to view the resolution as a modest, unifying gesture that records history and honors responders.
Concerned primarily with accurate implementation, clear inscription, and avoiding unnecessary controversy.
Strongly supportive as an affirmation of law-and-order and to honor officers who defended the Capitol against violence.
Sees the plaque as appropriate recognition and deterrent to future attacks.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
By content this is a narrow, symbolic measure with low cost and broad appeal; historically similar memorial measures pass both chambers easily. Note: as a concurrent resolution it is not submitted to the President and does not create statutory law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives worry about memorializing police without accountability context
By content this is a narrow, symbolic measure with low cost and broad appeal; historically similar memorial measures pass both chambers eas…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly scoped commemorative directive that identifies the responsible party, location, and a 30-day installation deadline, and it references existing le…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.