H. Con. Res. 34 (110th)Bill Overview

Honoring Percy Lavon Julian's Life and Achievements

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|BlacksChemical research
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 18, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a concurrent resolution adopted by Congress to honor Percy Lavon Julian and recognize his scientific accomplishments. It expresses the collective sentiment of both chambers but does not create a new law, change government programs, or obligate funding. Concurrent resolutions are used for formal statements or matters affecting both houses, not for actions that require legal force. This resolution simply records Congresss official recognition of Julian's life and work.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are passed by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law. This resolution was agreed to as a formal, nonbinding recognition of an individual.

This concurrent resolution honors the life and scientific achievements of Percy Lavon Julian, noting his education, key chemical syntheses (physostigmine and a commercial cortisone process), over 130 patents, election to the National Academy of Sciences, and advocacy for African Americans in science.

It formally recognizes his contributions and legacy and records that Congress honors him.

Passage0/100

Concurrent resolutions are ceremonial and do not become law; historically such measures are routinely adopted by both chambers.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and includes the customary, minimal procedural elements necessary for adoption and entry into the congressional record.

Contention12/100

Progressive wants linked policy actions; conservatives prefer purely ceremonial

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · StudentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of Julian's scientific contributions and historical importance.
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition that can support inclusion in educational curricula and exhibits.
  • StudentsSymbolically highlights diversity in STEM, potentially encouraging minority students to pursue scientific careers.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is purely symbolic and creates no binding legal, budgetary, or regulatory effects.
  • Potential burdenUses congressional time for ceremonial recognition rather than substantive legislative activity.
  • Federal agenciesDoes not directly create jobs, change taxes, or alter federal spending.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants linked policy actions; conservatives prefer purely ceremonial
Progressive95%

Likely views the resolution positively as overdue recognition of a Black scientist whose work advanced medicine and broke racial barriers.

Would value the symbolic affirmation of representation in STEM while noting the measure is ceremonial and not a policy fix.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Sees the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan tribute to a notable American scientist and inventor.

Appreciates the historical recognition while noting it is ceremonial and has no policy or budgetary impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive as a tribute to individual achievement, innovation, and self-made success.

May prefer private or local honors but generally sees no objection to a ceremonial congressional recognition.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Concurrent resolutions are ceremonial and do not become law; historically such measures are routinely adopted by both chambers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Procedural scheduling and timing in the other chamber
  • Potential for non-substantive amendments or motions to delay
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants linked policy actions; conservatives prefer purely ceremonial

Concurrent resolutions are ceremonial and do not become law; historically such measures are routinely adopted by both chambers.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and includes the customary, minimal procedural elements necessary for adopti…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis