H. Con. Res. 35 (110th)Bill Overview

Support National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day

Concurrent ResolutionHealth|Access to health careAffordable housing
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 18, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1311)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement by both chambers of Congress expressing support for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day and urging awareness, testing, prevention, and treatment efforts. It recounts health statistics, encourages funding and community efforts, and asks state and local governments and media to publicize the day. It does not create new law, spend money, or require action by anyone.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are passed by both the House and Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This resolution was passed by the House and received in the Senate for consideration.

This concurrent resolution expresses Congress's support for National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day, cites CDC data on the disproportionate impact of HIV/AIDS on African Americans, and encourages testing, public awareness, and funding.

It endorses full and equitable funding for the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006, applauds codifying the Minority AIDS Initiative, and supports prevention, treatment linkage, reducing incarceration-driven infections, and community-strengthening efforts.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution expressing sentiment, it is not a law and cannot become statute even if adopted by both chambers.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a clear and well-constructed commemorative resolution: it documents the problem with supporting data, expresses congressional support, and directs nonbinding encouragement to appropriate actors. It does not create legal obligations or funding authorities, which is consistent with its form.

Contention55/100

Left sees strong equity and funding benefits; right worries about federal spending

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could raise voluntary HIV testing rates in African-American communities.
  • Local governmentsEncouraging state and local action could strengthen local prevention and testing programs.
  • Potential benefitSupport for Ryan White funding may bolster treatment services if appropriations follow.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNonbinding resolution may have little direct effect on policy or funding.
  • Potential burdenWithout new appropriations, calls for funding are symbolic, not fiscal commitments.
  • Federal agenciesFederal encouragement of state action could raise expectations not matched by resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left sees strong equity and funding benefits; right worries about federal spending
Progressive90%

Sees the resolution as a positive, overdue federal recognition of racial disparities in HIV/AIDS.

Views support for Ryan White funding and the Minority AIDS Initiative as necessary steps toward equity and care access.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Views the resolution as a helpful public-health statement and a useful awareness tool, though primarily symbolic.

Supports targeted funding and measurable implementation while seeking clarity on costs and privacy protections.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

May accept the resolution's goal of reducing HIV/AIDS but is wary of open-ended federal spending and symbolic resolutions.

Concerned about race-based focus being politicized and potential support for policies they oppose, like reduced incarceration or certain harm-reduction programs.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution expressing sentiment, it is not a law and cannot become statute even if adopted by both chambers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will schedule or prioritize the measure
  • Possible objections to language on incarceration or transmission routes
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left sees strong equity and funding benefits; right worries about federal spending

As a concurrent resolution expressing sentiment, it is not a law and cannot become statute even if adopted by both chambers.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a clear and well-constructed commemorative resolution: it documents the problem with supporting data, expresses congressional support, and directs nonbin…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis