H. Con. Res. 36 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the life, achievements, and public service of former First Lady Barbara Pierce Bush on the occasion of her 100th birthday.

Concurrent ResolutionGovernment Operations and Politics|Commemorative events and holidaysCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement from Congress recognizing Barbara Bush's life and public service on the occasion of what would have been her 100th birthday. It lists biographical facts and gives thanks for her work promoting literacy and public service. It does not create new law, change government programs, or require action by the President or federal agencies. Instead, it is a formal honor and expression of appreciation from both chambers of Congress.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not become law. They are commonly used for commemorations, expressions of sentiment, or internal Congressional matters.

This concurrent resolution honors the life, achievements, and public service of former First Lady Barbara Pierce Bush on the occasion of what would have been her 100th birthday.

It recounts biographical details (birth in 1925, education, marriage to George H.

W.

Passage85/100

Based solely on content and historical patterns, a short, nonbinding commemorative concurrent resolution honoring a widely recognized former First Lady is highly likely to be agreed to by both chambers. It carries no fiscal or regulatory consequences and is low controversy, so substantive opposition is unlikely. Note: concurrent resolutions are expressions of Congress and do not create binding law or require presidential signature.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is an appropriately constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: it supplies factual background and clear declarative clauses to honor Barbara Pierce Bush, and it contains the minimal necessary textual elements for its symbolic function.

Contention12/100

Degree of enthusiasm: conservatives strongly endorse the symbolic honor; liberals accept the literacy focus but are more wary of celebrating a powerful political dynasty.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFormally recognizes and preserves the public record of Barbara Bush's contributions (notably her national literacy advo…
  • Local governmentsElevates public awareness of literacy and family literacy programs, potentially encouraging private donations or volunt…
  • Potential benefitProvides a bipartisan, symbolic gesture that can serve as a unifying civic commemoration and an educational moment abou…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay be criticized as a use of Congressional time and staff resources for a ceremonial resolution rather than for substa…
  • Potential burdenOffers no concrete policy, budgetary, environmental, or regulatory benefits; critics can argue it is purely symbolic wi…
  • Federal agenciesCould be viewed by some as redundant or unnecessary if similar honors already exist in the private sector, states, or p…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of enthusiasm: conservatives strongly endorse the symbolic honor; liberals accept the literacy focus but are more wary of celebrating a powerful political dynasty.
Progressive80%

A mainstream liberal would likely view this as a largely benign, ceremonial resolution that appropriately recognizes literacy advocacy and compassion toward marginalized people (e.g., AIDS patients).

They may be slightly uneasy about celebratory language for a member of a prominent conservative political family and about omitting critical context about policy positions tied to that family, but overall would accept the literacy and humanitarian recognition.

Because the text is non‑binding and focuses on charity and literacy, most mainstream progressives would not strongly oppose it.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

A centrist/moderate would treat the resolution as a conventional, bipartisan ceremonial honor that raises awareness of literacy and acknowledges public service.

They would note the absence of policy or fiscal impacts and regard it as low‑stakes.

Concerns would center on preserving nonpartisan tone and avoiding unnecessary politicization, but they would generally find the resolution acceptable.

Leans supportive
Conservative100%

A mainstream conservative would likely welcome and strongly support the resolution as an appropriate and deserved recognition of Barbara Bush’s life, family, and public service.

They would view the celebration of literacy advocacy, her role supporting family and public life, and the commemoration of a prominent Republican family positively.

Because the measure is ceremonial, it aligns with conservative respect for tradition and honoring public figures.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Based solely on content and historical patterns, a short, nonbinding commemorative concurrent resolution honoring a widely recognized former First Lady is highly likely to be agreed to by both chambers. It carries no fiscal or regulatory consequences and is low controversy, so substantive opposition is unlikely. Note: concurrent resolutions are expressions of Congress and do not create binding law or require presidential signature.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether either chamber places the resolution on the unanimous-consent or suspension calendar promptly; scheduling/priorities can delay otherwise noncontroversial measures.
  • Although content is noncontroversial, individual members could object on procedural or political grounds; such objections are uncommon for this type of resolution but possible.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of enthusiasm: conservatives strongly endorse the symbolic honor; liberals accept the literacy focus but are more wary of celebratin…

Based solely on content and historical patterns, a short, nonbinding commemorative concurrent resolution honoring a widely recognized forme…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is an appropriately constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: it supplies factual background and clear declarative clauses to honor Barbara Pierce Bush, and it…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis