H. Con. Res. 42 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor WWII U.S. Army Air Forces Glider Pilots

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Aircraft pilotsArmed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jan 23, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement by Congress honoring the World War II glider pilots of the U.S. Army Air Forces and urging Americans to remember and teach their service. It lists specific missions and sacrifices but does not change any law or create legal rights or obligations. It serves as an expression of recognition and remembrance by both chambers of Congress.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law; this resolution passed the House and was received in the Senate.

This concurrent resolution honors the World War II glider pilots of the U.S. Army Air Forces for their service and sacrifice, lists major operations in which they took part, and urges Americans to remember and teach future generations about those contributions.

Passage5/100

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers, but concurrent resolutions are non‑binding and do not become law; score reflects that legal enactment is not applicable.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides specific historical context. It uses the expected minimal mechanisms (declarative honor and public urging) without attempting to create legal obligations, appropriations, or programmatic changes.

Contention5/100

Liberty/left wants pairing with concrete veteran supports

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
VeteransVeterans

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • VeteransProvides symbolic recognition that validates veterans' service and sacrifices.
  • Potential benefitEncourages educational efforts and public history programming about glider operations in WWII.
  • Potential benefitMay increase public awareness, museum visitation, and private donations for related exhibits.
Likely burdened
  • VeteransIs nonbinding and does not create new benefits, services, or legal rights for veterans.
  • Potential burdenUses legislative time for symbolic recognition rather than enacting substantive policy changes.
  • VeteransMay be redundant with existing memorials, commemorations, and veterans recognition efforts.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty/left wants pairing with concrete veteran supports
Progressive80%

Likely supportive of the symbolic recognition of veterans and historical remembrance.

May note the resolution is purely ceremonial and prefer concrete policy for veterans or more inclusive commemorations.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable as a non-controversial, bipartisan tribute to military service.

Views it as appropriate symbolic recognition but notes it creates no legal obligations or spending.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive as patriotic recognition of military bravery and sacrifice.

Sees the resolution as appropriate, inexpensive, and respectful of historic service.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers, but concurrent resolutions are non‑binding and do not become law; score reflects that legal enactment is not applicable.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • This is a concurrent resolution, not a statute
  • Senate committee scheduling and prioritization
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty/left wants pairing with concrete veteran supports

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers, but concurrent resolutions are non‑binding and do not become law; score reflects that legal enac…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides specific historical context. It uses the expected minimal mechan…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis