H. Con. Res. 42 (111th)Bill Overview

Honor Schomburg Center's African-American Migration Project

Concurrent ResolutionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues|Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 10, 2009
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a formal statement by both chambers of Congress recognizing the Schomburg Center and its online project about African-American migrations. It praises the center, recalls migration history, and urges support for educational library projects. It does not create or change any law and does not require the President's signature. It is symbolic and intended to express Congresss view and priorities rather than impose legal duties.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. They are used to express the collective view of Congress or to handle internal congressional matters.

This concurrent resolution recognizes the New York Public Library’s Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture and its online presentation “In Motion: The African‑American Migration Experience.” It recounts forced and voluntary migrations of African‑descended peoples, honors their courage and suffering, affirms commitments to racial equality and education, and endorses further support for library projects that teach this history.

The resolution is declarative and does not appropriate funds or create regulatory changes.

Passage85/100

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers as a commemorative concurrent resolution given low cost and low controversy; adoption, not legal enactment, is the end point.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-articulated symbolic concurrent resolution: it clearly identifies and honors the Schomburg Center and describes the historical subject matter. It contains virtually no operative provisions, funding, or implementation detail, which is typical for a commemorative resolution but leaves any implied commitments unspecified.

Contention18/100

Liberals emphasize moral imperative and educational uplift

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedSchools · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases public awareness and education about African-American migration history through congressional recognition.
  • Potential benefitEncourages educators and institutions to use the Schomburg Center’s online resources and lesson plans.
  • Potential benefitSymbolically reaffirms Congress's commitment to remembering slavery and pursuing racial equality.
Likely burdened
  • SchoolsProvides no direct funding or mandated resources for libraries or schools.
  • StatesActs as a symbolic statement without implementing concrete policy changes or reparative actions.
  • Local governmentsMay provoke debates over historical interpretation and local curriculum control.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize moral imperative and educational uplift
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The resolution affirms historical truth about slavery and migrations, highlights contributions of African‑descended peoples, and endorses educational resources.

It aligns with values of racial justice, public education, and cultural recognition.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Overall supportive but pragmatic.

The resolution is a nonbinding recognition of history and a support for cultural institutions, which is appropriate.

Centrists will note its symbolic nature and prefer concrete, fiscally responsible follow‑ups if action is desired.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Cautiously amenable but watchful.

Many conservatives will accept a commemorative resolution honoring historical experiences, though some may object to language implying federal obligations to 'relieve inequities' or to further federal support for particular projects.

Concerns focus on potential politicization and implied spending.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers as a commemorative concurrent resolution given low cost and low controversy; adoption, not legal enactment, is the end point.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Procedural scheduling and competing floor priorities
  • Possible objections to particular historical wording
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize moral imperative and educational uplift

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers as a commemorative concurrent resolution given low cost and low controversy; adoption, not leg…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-articulated symbolic concurrent resolution: it clearly identifies and honors the Schomburg Center and describes the historical subject matter. It contains v…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis