H. Con. Res. 47 (110th)Bill Overview

Support National Medal of Honor Day

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsCongress
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 30, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's support for establishing a National Medal of Honor Day, recognizes and honors Medal of Honor recipients, and suggests March 25 as an appropriate date. It encourages national, state, and local organizations to raise public awareness and recognize recipients. It does not create a federal holiday or change any law; it is a formal, nonbinding statement of support by Congress.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. They are used to express the collective views of Congress or handle matters affecting both chambers.

This concurrent resolution recognizes the heroism of Medal of Honor recipients, supports creating a National Medal of Honor Day on March 25, and encourages public education and commemoration of their service.

It is a nonbinding expression of Congress’s support for the goals and ideals of such a day.

Passage0/100

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become statutory law; passage by both chambers is likely but not a lawmaking outcome.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated commemorative concurrent resolution that appropriately confines itself to nonbinding recognition and support for a National Medal of Honor Day, with a proposed date and supporting facts.

Contention8/100

Progressives stress linking recognition to veteran services and context

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsVeterans

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national awareness and public appreciation for Medal of Honor recipients.
  • Potential benefitEncourages educational programs and public ceremonies about valor and military history.
  • Local governmentsPromotes state and local observances coordinated with national recognition efforts.
Likely burdened
  • VeteransOffers only symbolic recognition without additional benefits, services, or funding for veterans.
  • VeteransMay divert attention from policy debates or funding needs for veterans' programs.
  • Potential burdenContributes to proliferation of commemorative days, potentially diluting public impact.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress linking recognition to veteran services and context
Progressive80%

Generally favorable toward honoring individual sacrifice and raising public awareness, while cautious about glorifying war without addressing veterans' needs.

Sees educational value but may want linkage to veteran services, diversity of recipients, and context about the costs of war.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Supportive of a nonbinding, symbolic day that honors Medal of Honor recipients and offers civic education.

Sees low fiscal impact and bipartisan appeal but wants to keep observance nonpolitical and fiscally modest.

Leans supportive
Conservative98%

Strongly supportive as a patriotic recognition of military valor and national service.

Views a National Medal of Honor Day as appropriate, morale-boosting, and consistent with honoring armed forces.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become statutory law; passage by both chambers is likely but not a lawmaking outcome.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether both chambers will formally agree to the concurrent resolution
  • Possible procedural holds or scheduling delays in either chamber
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress linking recognition to veteran services and context

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become statutory law; passage by both chambers is likely but not a lawmaking outcome.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly articulated commemorative concurrent resolution that appropriately confines itself to nonbinding recognition and support for a National Medal of Honor Da…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis