Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
This resolution changes the internal rules of both the House and the Senate so members can designate another member as a proxy to cast their vote and can participate remotely in committee proceedings under specified circumstances. It lists allowed reasons (certain family and medical leave situations, short-term illness limits, jury duty, death in the family, limited military service, and travel blocked by emergencies) and requires a signed letter and any documentation the Clerk or Secretary may require. The House Clerk and Senate Secretary must keep and publish records of proxy designations and remote participation. These changes affect only congressional procedure and do not create or change public law outside the chambers.
This is a concurrent resolution that must be adopted by both the House and the Senate but is not sent to the President and does not become statutory law; it only alters internal chamber rules and practices. The House Clerk and the Secretary of the Senate are directed to implement recordkeeping and public disclosure of proxy and remote participation.
This concurrent resolution authorizes Members of the House and Senators to designate proxies to cast votes and to participate remotely in committee proceedings under specified grounds.
Covered grounds mirror FMLA leave categories, short illnesses (up to 7 days), jury service, bereavement (up to 4 days), uniformed service (limited days), and travel-preventing events like acts of God or terrorist attacks.
Members must submit a signed (electronic permitted) letter certifying the ground and may need to provide documentation; Clerks/Secretaries must publish designations and counts.
Low-to-moderate chance: administratively modest and safeguarded, likely acceptable in one chamber but substantial Senate obstacles reduce overall adoption prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution provides a clear and concrete rule-level framework for allowing proxy voting and remote committee participation in enumerated circumstances, with specific grounds, day limits, and public recordkeeping duties. It amends named rules and references existing statutory definitions where appropriate.
Left emphasizes accessibility and accommodation benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes accessibility and accommodation benefits
Generally favorable.
Sees the resolution as expanding access and accommodation for caregiving, illness, military duty, and emergencies.
Values the transparency provisions requiring documentation and public lists.
Cautiously supportive.
Views the proposal as a pragmatic accommodation balancing representation and the need for members to address personal obligations.
Appreciates built-in limits (day caps) and public reporting, but worries about administrative execution and partisan exploitation.
Skeptical.
Sees proxy and remote voting as weakening institutional norms of in-person deliberation and accountability.
Concerned it could expand party leaders' control over votes and enable absentee governance.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-to-moderate chance: administratively modest and safeguarded, likely acceptable in one chamber but substantial Senate obstacles reduce overall adoption prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes accessibility and accommodation benefits
Low-to-moderate chance: administratively modest and safeguarded, likely acceptable in one chamber but substantial Senate obstacles reduce o…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution provides a clear and concrete rule-level framework for allowing proxy voting and remote committee participation in enumerated circumstances, with specific groun…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.