H. Con. Res. 76 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the visionary leadership of Chief Richard LaMunyon and the profound global impact of the Law Enforcement Torch Run for Special Olympics.

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 5, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This concurrent resolution formally recognizes Chief Richard LaMunyon for founding the Law Enforcement Torch Run (LETR) for Special Olympics, notes Eunice Kennedy Shriver’s support, and cites LETR’s growth to all 50 U.S. states, Canadian provinces, and over 25 countries.

It records participation of more than 150,000 law enforcement officers annually and total funds raised of $1,139,597,747, commends officers, and celebrates LETR’s contributions to Special Olympics.

Passage90/100

Symbolic, narrow, no fiscal impact, and broadly nonpartisan—these consistently clear both chambers absent procedural delays.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it identifies and documents historical facts, sets out clear declaratory statements (recognize, commend, celebrate), and contains no substantive policy, funding, or statutory changes.

Contention12/100

Progressive cautious about praising police without acknowledging reform needs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases public awareness of the LETR and Special Olympics activities nationwide.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides official recognition that may boost morale among participating law enforcement volunteers.
  • Targeted stakeholdersHighlights the movement's reported $1.14 billion fundraising total, possibly encouraging continued donations.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersIs symbolic and creates no binding legal, budgetary, or regulatory changes.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay draw criticism for using Congressional time on ceremonial recognition instead of substantive policy issues.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould be viewed as a broad endorsement of law enforcement despite unrelated policing accountability debates.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive cautious about praising police without acknowledging reform needs
Progressive75%

Generally positive about the Special Olympics’ mission and athlete inclusion, so this recognition is welcome.

However, some caution arises from explicit praise of law enforcement given ongoing concerns about policing practices; the resolution is purely symbolic and does not change policy.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Sees this as a noncontroversial, bipartisan recognition of a successful volunteer and fundraising effort that strengthens community ties.

Values the symbolic gesture while noting it carries no spending or regulatory effects.

Leans supportive
Conservative100%

Strongly supportive: values honoring law enforcement leadership and civic initiatives that bolster community trust.

Views the resolution as appropriate recognition of charitable service and patriotism without expanding government powers.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Symbolic, narrow, no fiscal impact, and broadly nonpartisan—these consistently clear both chambers absent procedural delays.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Referral to committees could delay floor consideration
  • Possible minor textual/formatting edits or caption issues
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive cautious about praising police without acknowledging reform needs

Symbolic, narrow, no fiscal impact, and broadly nonpartisan—these consistently clear both chambers absent procedural delays.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it identifies and documents historical facts, sets out clear declaratory statements (recognize, co…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis