H. Con. Res. 79 (119th)Bill Overview

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state of the remains of Air Force Major John A. Klinner, Captain Ariana G. Savino, Captain Seth R. Koval, Captain Curtis J…

Congress|Congress
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 18, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This concurrent resolution authorizes the use of the U.S. Capitol Rotunda for the lying in state of six members of the U.S. Air Force who served in support of Operation Epic Fury.

The date will be set by the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House, and the Architect of the Capitol will make necessary arrangements.

The resolution is ceremonial and directs no programmatic spending or policy changes beyond arranging the event.

Passage90/100

Very likely given narrow ceremonial purpose, negligible fiscal impact, concise text, and strong historical precedent for swift bipartisan approval.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly focused commemorative authorization that identifies the persons honored, the location (Capitol rotunda), and responsible officials for scheduling and execution. It delegates practical implementation to the Architect of the Capitol under the direction of congressional leaders.

Contention10/100

Progressive raises concerns about glorifying the underlying military operation

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
FamiliesFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersFormally honors and recognizes the military service and sacrifice of the six named service members.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides a public venue for mourning and official condolences for families and the public.
  • FamiliesMay boost military and family morale by signaling national recognition of battlefield losses.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRequires federal resources for security, logistics, and staffing, generating additional government costs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay temporarily restrict public access to portions of the Capitol and disrupt normal operations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould set or reinforce precedents about rotunda use, producing competition for ceremonial space.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive raises concerns about glorifying the underlying military operation
Progressive95%

Likely supportive as a solemn recognition of service and loss, while noting broader questions about the conflict that produced these casualties.

Would welcome support for families and public commemoration, but may call for transparency on costs and for the ceremony to avoid glorifying contentious military operations.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive as a customary, noncontroversial congressional honor for fallen service members.

Sees the resolution as appropriate while advising careful, cost-conscious administration and nonpartisan execution to avoid political optics.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive as a proper, honorable recognition of fallen military personnel and an affirmation of national values.

Will emphasize respect for troops, morale, and tradition, while generally opposing politicization of the event.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Very likely given narrow ceremonial purpose, negligible fiscal impact, concise text, and strong historical precedent for swift bipartisan approval.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential Senate procedural hold or objection
  • Exact date and scheduling conflicts
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive raises concerns about glorifying the underlying military operation

Very likely given narrow ceremonial purpose, negligible fiscal impact, concise text, and strong historical precedent for swift bipartisan a…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and narrowly focused commemorative authorization that identifies the persons honored, the location (Capitol rotunda), and responsible officials for schedul…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis