H. Con. Res. 82 (111th)Bill Overview

Request USPS Issue Chaney-Goodman-Schwerner Stamp

Concurrent ResolutionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues|Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 25, 2009
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement from Congress asking the Postal Service to issue a commemorative stamp honoring James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner. It specifically asks the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee to recommend the stamp to the Postmaster General. The resolution does not create a law or force the Postal Service to act; it expresses Congress's view and makes a formal request.

Passage rules

As a concurrent resolution, it would need to be adopted by both the House and the Senate but is not sent to the President and does not become law. It expresses the sense of Congress rather than imposing a legal requirement.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the U.S. Postal Service should issue a commemorative stamp honoring civil rights activists James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner.

It asks the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee to recommend such a stamp to the Postmaster General.

The resolution is advisory and does not appropriate funds or require issuance.

Passage85/100

Nonbinding, narrow, honorific resolution historically attracts bipartisan approval; main barrier is chamber scheduling and USPS independence.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is clear in purpose and identifies the relevant operational actors but remains intentionally limited in procedural and fiscal detail.

Contention15/100

Liberal emphasizes social justice symbolism and education.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesCreates a federal recognition honoring civil rights activists and victims of racial violence.
  • Potential benefitProvides an educational tool that may increase public awareness of Freedom Summer and voting rights history.
  • Potential benefitMay generate modest additional revenue and collector interest for the Postal Service through stamp sales.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenUses Postal Service resources for a symbolic item rather than operational priorities.
  • Potential burdenMay prompt requests for many additional commemorative stamps, increasing administrative review workload.
  • Local governmentsCould be viewed as federal involvement in shaping historical memory of state and local events.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes social justice symbolism and education.
Progressive95%

Likely supportive as a recognition of civil rights sacrifice and multiracial solidarity.

Views the stamp as a modest federal acknowledgement of historic injustice and progress.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable because the resolution is symbolic and nonbinding.

Sees value in public commemoration while noting limited practical effect and low fiscal impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Mostly supportive but cautious; likely accepts commemoration of civil rights victims while wary of federal symbolic activism.

Concerned that symbolic acts could be politicized.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Nonbinding, narrow, honorific resolution historically attracts bipartisan approval; main barrier is chamber scheduling and USPS independence.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • USPS independent discretion to actually issue the stamp
  • Senate calendar or procedural delays despite low controversy
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes social justice symbolism and education.

Nonbinding, narrow, honorific resolution historically attracts bipartisan approval; main barrier is chamber scheduling and USPS independenc…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is clear in purpose and identifies the relevant operational actors but remains intentionally limited in procedural and fiscal detail.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis