Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This resolution asks Americans to observe February 13 each year as Negro Leaguers Recognition Day and to honor the teams and players of the Negro Baseball Leagues. It is a non-binding, ceremonial statement by Congress that recognizes history and encourages public observance. It does not create a federal holiday, change the law, or require Presidential approval.
Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This is a ceremonial recognition and carries no binding legal effect.
This concurrent resolution encourages recognition each year on February 13 as Negro Leaguers Recognition Day, marking the February 13, 1920 founding of the Negro National League in Kansas City, Missouri.
The text recounts historical details about the Negro Baseball Leagues, highlights notable players and contributors, and formally recognizes the teams and players for their contributions to baseball and the Nation.
The resolution is non‑binding and asks Americans to observe the day and recognize the leagues' achievements.
Symbolic, nonbinding, low‑cost commemorative resolutions historically clear Congress easily; procedural/calendar factors remain the main barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states and documents the historical rationale for designating an annual Negro Leaguers Recognition Day and formally urges Americans to observe it.
Liberals want accompanying educational or funding measures; conservatives prefer symbolism only.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals want accompanying educational or funding measures; conservatives prefer symbolism only.
Likely welcomes the resolution as a symbolic acknowledgement of Black history, civil rights progress, and cultural contributions.
May view it as a modest step toward recognizing institutional exclusion and celebrating historically marginalized athletes, while wishing for accompanying educational or preservation measures.
Would view the resolution as a broadly appropriate, low‑cost, symbolic recognition of historical contributions.
Appreciates historic detail and nonbinding language, while noting limited practical effects and preferring clarity that it creates no new mandates or spending.
Many conservatives would likely support honoring baseball history and notable figures like Jackie Robinson, but some may question federal involvement in symbolic designations.
Overall the nonbinding, encouraging language reduces objections; fiscal conservatives may still prefer local or private recognition.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Symbolic, nonbinding, low‑cost commemorative resolutions historically clear Congress easily; procedural/calendar factors remain the main barriers.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals want accompanying educational or funding measures; conservatives prefer symbolism only.
Symbolic, nonbinding, low‑cost commemorative resolutions historically clear Congress easily; procedural/calendar factors remain the main ba…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states and documents the historical rationale for designating an annual Negro Leaguers Recognition…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.