H. Con. Res. 9 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor Shirley Chisholm with a USPS Commemorative Stamp

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|BlacksCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 4, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the Postal Service should issue a commemorative stamp honoring Shirley Chisholm and asks the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee to recommend that action to the Postmaster General. It is a formal statement of support from both chambers but does not create a law or force the Postal Service to act. If adopted by both the House and the Senate, it records Congress's view and encourages the committee and Postmaster General to consider the stamp.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be passed by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law.

This concurrent resolution expresses the Sense of Congress that the U.S. Postal Service should issue a commemorative postage stamp honoring former Representative Shirley Chisholm, and urges the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee to recommend such a stamp to the Postmaster General.

The resolution is nonbinding and purely symbolic, describing Chisholm’s historical milestones and public service.

Passage0/100

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; it can be adopted but cannot become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-formed symbolic/concurrent resolution that clearly states a commemorative purpose and identifies the administrative entities it urges to act. It deliberately remains non-binding and avoids statutory amendment or funding implications.

Contention20/100

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation symbolism

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRecognizes and honors Shirley Chisholm’s historic public service and civil rights leadership.
  • Potential benefitAffirms representation of women and African Americans in nationally distributed commemoratives.
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of Chisholm’s contributions and related civil rights history.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenResolution is non-binding and therefore may have no practical effect on stamp issuance.
  • Potential burdenRepresents symbolic congressional action that some may view as a low legislative priority.
  • Potential burdenMay be criticized for favoring one commemorative subject over other historical figures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation symbolism
Progressive95%

Sees the resolution as an appropriate symbolic recognition of a pioneering Black woman and civil-rights advocate.

Views the stamp as a modest but meaningful action to honor representation and women's political history.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Views the resolution as a low-cost, nonbinding, bipartisan tribute suitable for Congressional recognition.

Supports honoring historical firsts while preferring the process remain nonpartisan and procedural.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

May respect honoring a historic first but is cautious about symbolic federal endorsements for partisan figures.

Concerned about precedent of politicizing Postal Service commemorations.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; it can be adopted but cannot become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will prioritize and schedule the measure
  • Senate willingness to take up and agree to the concurrent resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil-rights and representation symbolism

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and does not create law; it can be adopted but cannot become statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-formed symbolic/concurrent resolution that clearly states a commemorative purpose and identifies the administrative entities it urges to act. It deliberatel…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis