H. Con. Res. 91 (110th)Bill Overview

Support National Brain Injury Awareness Month

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|BrainCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 13, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's support for greater public awareness of traumatic brain injury and for naming a National Brain Injury Awareness Month. It highlights the number of Americans affected, the costs, and the needs of veterans returning with such injuries. It asks Congress to recognize the impact and encourages the President to issue a proclamation designating a month. It is a statement of support and does not by itself create binding law or new programs.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be agreed to by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This resolution is a formal, non-binding expression of Congress's view and urges the President to consider issuing a proclamation.

This concurrent resolution recognizes traumatic brain injury (TBI) as a major public health issue, cites incidence, long-term disability, and economic costs, and supports designating a National Brain Injury Awareness Month.

It highlights TBI as a ‘‘silent epidemic’’ and the signature wound of recent wars, notes veterans' needs, and encourages the President to proclaim an awareness month.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution it is nonbinding and not a law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but it cannot become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it documents the public-health concern, endorses a national awareness month, and asks the President for a proclamation without creating legal obligations or requiring funding.

Contention25/100

Liberal emphasizes funding, care expansion; conservative warns of federal spending

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
VeteransFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of TBI, potentially improving prevention and early recognition.
  • VeteransIncreases visibility for veterans' TBI issues, possibly prompting additional policy attention.
  • Potential benefitBolsters advocacy and fundraising efforts by nonprofits focused on brain injury.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs largely symbolic and does not provide funding or create enforceable obligations.
  • Federal agenciesMay raise expectations for federal resources without committing new appropriations.
  • Potential burdenUses congressional time for a nonbinding resolution rather than substantive legislation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes funding, care expansion; conservative warns of federal spending
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive because the resolution raises awareness of a public-health crisis and veterans' needs.

Sees it as an opportunity to mobilize prevention, research, rehabilitation, and disability supports, though the text is symbolic and lacks funding specifics.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable to the awareness and veterans-focus, while noting the resolution is nonbinding.

Wants the symbolic step tied to measurable, costed policy actions and collaboration with states and private groups.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Mildly supportive of awareness and veterans recognition but cautious about implied calls for new federal spending.

Prefers state, local, and private-sector responses and opposes unfunded federal mandates.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution it is nonbinding and not a law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but it cannot become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will schedule floor consideration
  • Timing and competing legislative priorities
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes funding, care expansion; conservative warns of federal spending

As a concurrent resolution it is nonbinding and not a law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but it cannot become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it documents the public-health concern, endorses a national awareness month, and asks the Presiden…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis