H. Con. Res. 95 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor Frances E. Allen's Career and Turing Award

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Awards, medals, prizesCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 20, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a concurrent resolution passed by Congress to honor Frances E. Allen for her career and receipt of the A.M. Turing Award. It expresses the view and recognition of both chambers but does not create binding law or change legal rights. It is a formal commendation and does not require the President's signature.

Passage rules

This measure was passed by the House and received in the Senate. Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both chambers but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law.

Concurrent resolution honoring Frances E.

Allen for her career and research accomplishments, including being the first woman recipient of the A.M. Turing Award.

The resolution praises her contributions to compiler optimization, high-performance computing, IBM leadership roles, and efforts to encourage women in computer science.

Passage90/100

By content, adoption by both chambers is highly likely for a ceremonial concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not create binding law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses an appropriate, minimal mechanism to accomplish that purpose. It does not attempt substantive legal change or require implementation resources.

Contention5/100

Progressives emphasize need for concrete diversity policy alongside recognition

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StudentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases public visibility of women’s contributions in computing through formal congressional recognition.
  • StudentsEncourages students, especially women, to consider computer science careers (indirect and uncertain).
  • Potential benefitAcknowledges foundational research, enhancing reputational value for institutions and industry partners.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenProvides only symbolic recognition and creates no legal, budgetary, or regulatory changes.
  • Potential burdenConsumes congressional time and staff resources for an honorific measure.
  • Potential burdenMay be viewed as performative without accompanying policy action on diversity or STEM education.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize need for concrete diversity policy alongside recognition
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive of recognizing a pioneering woman in computing and the symbolic value for gender equity in STEM.

May welcome the honor but note the resolution is symbolic and does not address structural barriers women face in technology.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable as a noncontroversial, merit-based recognition of technical achievement and service.

Sees the resolution as bipartisan and appropriate, while noting it has no regulatory or budgetary effects.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive because the resolution honors individual achievement, innovation, and American industry contributions.

May prefer emphasis on merit and be cautious about identity-based framing, but overall noncontroversial.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

By content, adoption by both chambers is highly likely for a ceremonial concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not create binding law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will schedule floor consideration
  • Potential for any objection or holds in committee
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize need for concrete diversity policy alongside recognition

By content, adoption by both chambers is highly likely for a ceremonial concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not create bi…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and uses an appropriate, minimal mechanism to accomplish that purpose. It doe…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis