- Federal agenciesPreserves federal guidance on data protection, supporting consumer privacy expectations.
- Targeted stakeholdersMaintains regulatory basis for supervisory or enforcement actions related to data security.
- Targeted stakeholdersReduces uncertainty for covered entities by keeping existing guidance in place.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule…
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act (chapter 8 of title 5, U.S.C.) to disapprove a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection rule that would withdraw Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-04.
If enacted, the disapproval nullifies the agency’s submitted rule (90 Fed.
Reg. 20084 (May 12, 2025)) and prevents that withdrawal from taking effect, leaving Circular 2022-04 (87 Fed.
Content is narrow and technically clear, but politically contentious and requires Senate approval within CRA timing constraints.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval that is clear about its target and legal effect and requires minimal additional scaffolding.
Liberals emphasize consumer data protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory burden.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersPreserving the Circular maintains compliance costs for financial institutions and service providers.
- Targeted stakeholdersCould constrain firms' operational flexibility and product development due to prescriptive expectations.
- Targeted stakeholdersLimits the CFPB's discretion to update or rescind guidance in response to new information.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize consumer data protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory burden.
Likely strongly supportive: preserves CFPB guidance treating poor data protection as an enforcement concern.
Views maintaining the Circular as protecting consumers' sensitive data from weak security practices.
Cautiously favorable but pragmatic: appreciates consumer protection aims, worries about procedure and economic impacts.
Wants clarity on legal effect and costs before full endorsement.
Likely opposed: views resolution as blocking necessary regulatory rollback and expanding CFPB enforcement discretion.
Prefers limiting federal guidance that increases business liability.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and technically clear, but politically contentious and requires Senate approval within CRA timing constraints.
- No cost estimate or agency impact analysis included
- Intensity of stakeholder (industry versus consumer) lobbying
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize consumer data protection; conservatives emphasize regulatory burden.
Content is narrow and technically clear, but politically contentious and requires Senate approval within CRA timing constraints.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval that is clear about its target and legal effect and requires minimal additional scaffolding.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.