- Potential benefitReduces regulatory compliance costs for colleges and grant administrators.
- Potential benefitPreserves institutional autonomy over program design and funding priorities.
- Federal agenciesPrevents perceived expansion of federal mandates or unfunded obligations.
Disapprove Dept. of Education Postsecondary Student Success Grant
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove and nullify the Department of Education rule titled “Postsecondary Student Success Grant” (89 Fed. Reg. 48517, June 7, 2024).
Progressives emphasize harm to students and equity benefits lost
Single-issue CRA resolutions are procedurally straightforward in the House but still require a majority and political backing.
This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove and nullify the Department of Education rule titled “Postsecondary Student Success Grant” (89 Fed.
Reg. 48517, June 7, 2024).
If enacted, the rule would be treated as having no force or effect.
Narrow and administratively simple, but success hinges on congressional majorities and the executive branch’s approval or veto risk.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives emphasize harm to students and equity benefits lost
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesEliminates or delays a federal grant program intended to support postsecondary student success.
- Federal agenciesReduces federal capacity to implement targeted, evidence-based student support interventions.
- StudentsCreates uncertainty for institutions and students planning around the proposed grant program.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize harm to students and equity benefits lost
Likely opposed to the resolution because it blocks a Department of Education rule named for student success.
They would worry this prevents new student grant opportunities and undermines administrative action on higher-education supports.
Any benefits from oversight would be weighed against likely harms to students and equity goals.
Mixed reaction: values congressional oversight but wants more information about the rule’s costs and effects.
Would seek CBO score, implementation details, and evidence the rule benefits students before supporting disapproval.
Pragmatic about fixing poorly designed rules but cautious about blocking student assistance without alternatives.
Likely supportive of the resolution as a check on executive-branch rulemaking and to prevent expansion of federal programs.
Views disapproval as restoring congressional authority and preventing regulatory overreach or unfunded mandates on states and colleges.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and administratively simple, but success hinges on congressional majorities and the executive branch’s approval or veto risk.
- Substantive content and popularity of the underlying rule
- Whether the resolution falls within the CRA submission window
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize harm to students and equity benefits lost
Narrow and administratively simple, but success hinges on congressional majorities and the executive branch’s approval or veto risk.
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Disapprove Dept. of Education Postsecondary Student Success Gr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.