H.J. Res. 44 (119th)Bill Overview

Disapprove EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead…

CRA DisapprovalEnvironmental Protection|Environmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 12, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This joint resolution invokes the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the Environmental Protection Agency rule titled "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Improvements (LCRI)" (89 Fed. Reg. 86418, Oct 30, 2024).

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize public-health and environmental-justice harms.

Watch point

Simple, focused CRA resolutions are procedurally straightforward in the House but politically contentious; passage depends on chamber majority alignment.

This joint resolution invokes the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the Environmental Protection Agency rule titled "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Improvements (LCRI)" (89 Fed.

Reg. 86418, Oct 30, 2024).

If enacted, the resolution declares that the specified EPA rule "shall have no force or effect." The text contains no other amendments or policy details beyond disapproval.

Passage30/100

Narrow, procedural bill with clear partisan signaling; easier in one chamber but difficult to complete bicameral approval and survive executive action or veto.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize public-health and environmental-justice harms.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Utilities · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces immediate regulatory compliance costs for public water systems required by the EPA rule.
  • UtilitiesPrevents mandated lead service line replacement timelines that could raise utility capital expenditures.
  • Federal agenciesLimits new federal reporting and monitoring requirements imposed on utilities and states.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesDelays implementation of federal protections intended to reduce lead exposure in drinking water.
  • Potential burdenCould increase health risks, especially for children and pregnant people in affected communities.
  • Potential burdenUndermines EPA authority to establish uniform national drinking water standards and safeguards.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public-health and environmental-justice harms.
Progressive5%

Likely strongly opposed to the resolution because it nullifies an EPA drinking-water rule addressing lead and copper.

They view the rule as a public-health and environmental-justice measure and would see disapproval as removing necessary protections.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view: supports congressional oversight of rulemaking but worries about removing a public-health rule without alternatives.

Would want tradeoffs addressed like costs, timelines, and funding for compliance before supporting disapproval.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive of the resolution as a rollback of federal regulatory action.

Views disapproval as correcting EPA overreach and protecting utilities and ratepayers from costly mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow, procedural bill with clear partisan signaling; easier in one chamber but difficult to complete bicameral approval and survive executive action or veto.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will report the resolution to the floor
  • Senate floor scheduling and cloture dynamics
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public-health and environmental-justice harms.

Narrow, procedural bill with clear partisan signaling; easier in one chamber but difficult to complete bicameral approval and survive execu…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Disapprove EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis