H.J. Res. 92 (119th)Bill Overview

Disapprove OCC the review of applications under the Bank…

CRA DisapprovalFinance and Financial Sector|Finance and Financial Sector
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
CRA DisapprovalWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to overturn a recent federal regulatory rule. If both chambers pass the joint resolution and the President signs it (or Congress overrides a veto), the specified rule would be nullified and declared to have no force or effect. The Act also prevents the agency from issuing a substantially similar rule without new statutory authority from Congress.

Rule targeted

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rule concerning the review of applications under the Bank Merger Act (89 Fed. Reg. 78207; Sept. 25, 2024).

Issuing agency

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Department of the Treasury

Passage rules

Under the Congressional Review Act, the Senate may consider disapproval resolutions under expedited procedures that limit debate and prevent a filibuster, so they can pass with a simple majority; the resolution must also be passed by the House and presented to the President for signature to take effect.

This joint resolution invokes the Congressional Review Act to disapprove and nullify an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) rule concerning the review of Bank Merger Act applications (89 Fed.

Reg. 78207, Sept. 25, 2024).

If enacted, the rule would be declared to have no force or effect.

Passage30/100

Narrow and administratively simple, but success requires both chambers and presidential approval; outcomes hinge on legislative support and external lobbying.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted Congressional Review Act disapproval that is legally specific about the rule being nullified and the statutory vehicle for doing so but contains minimal explanatory, fiscal, or oversight detail.

Contention68/100

Progressive fears disapproval may weaken merger protections; conservatives see regulatory overreach.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitPrevents implementation of a rule supporters view as overbroad or disruptive to current merger review practices.
  • Potential benefitMaintains existing, familiar merger-review standards, promoting regulatory certainty for banks and applicants.
  • Potential benefitAvoids potential new compliance costs and administrative burdens for banks tied to the OCC's rule change.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenBlocks an OCC regulatory update that critics say could strengthen merger scrutiny for safety and stability.
  • Potential burdenAllows any substantive gaps the OCC sought to address to remain, potentially facilitating greater consolidation.
  • Potential burdenLimits the OCC's ability to modernize merger review to address new banking models like fintech integrations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive fears disapproval may weaken merger protections; conservatives see regulatory overreach.
Progressive20%

Progressive observers would likely view the resolution through the lens of bank consolidation and consumer protections.

If the OCC rule weakened merger review or eased consolidation, they would support rejecting it; if the rule strengthened review or added community safeguards, they would oppose this disapproval.

Because the bill text does not describe the rule's substance, their stance is conditional.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

A pragmatic centrist would request the OCC rule text and impact analysis before taking a firm position.

They will weigh predictability for banks, consumer and competition effects, and whether the rule clarifies or muddles merger review.

With insufficient detail in the resolution itself, the centrist response is mixed and cautious.

Split reaction
Conservative75%

Mainstream conservative observers are likely to view the resolution favorably if they perceive the OCC rule as an overreach that increases regulatory burden on banks.

They would frame disapproval as protecting community banks, financial competitiveness, and limiting agency expansion.

If the rule actually deregulated mergers, they might oppose disapproval, but absent details they generally align with the sponsor's intent to block the rule.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow and administratively simple, but success requires both chambers and presidential approval; outcomes hinge on legislative support and external lobbying.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of legislative support in each chamber
  • President's likely response/signature posture
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive fears disapproval may weaken merger protections; conservatives see regulatory overreach.

Narrow and administratively simple, but success requires both chambers and presidential approval; outcomes hinge on legislative support and…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted Congressional Review Act disapproval that is legally specific about the rule being nullified and the statutory vehicle for doing so but contain…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis