ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mrs. Biggs (SC) asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1000, a bill originally introduced by Repres…
This bill amends the Homeland Security Act to create the PIVOTT Program at CISA, partnering with community colleges, technical schools, and two-year institutions to fund scholarships and hands-on cyber training. It funds full-cost scholarships, required skills-based exercises and internships, a two-year public-service employment obligation, repayment rules, enrollment growth targets up to 10,000 students, and reporting and review requirements for CISA programs and CyberCorps support.
Federal funding scope: public investment vs. federal overreach
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal program with well-specified eligibility, program elements, obligations, and integration with existing legal frameworks.
This bill amends the Homeland Security Act to create the PIVOTT Program at CISA, partnering with community colleges, technical schools, and two-year institutions to fund scholarships and hands-on cyber training.
It funds full-cost scholarships, required skills-based exercises and internships, a two-year public-service employment obligation, repayment rules, enrollment growth targets up to 10,000 students, and reporting and review requirements for CISA programs and CyberCorps support.
Content is non-ideological and programmatic so passage is plausible, but enactment depends on appropriations and floor timing.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal program with well-specified eligibility, program elements, obligations, and integration with existing legal frameworks. It assigns clear implementation responsibility to CISA and includes enrollment targets, reporting requirements, and many practical contingencies.
Federal funding scope: public investment vs. federal overreach
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Federal funding scope: public investment vs. federal overreach
Generally supportive: expands affordable access to skills-based cyber training at community colleges and prioritizes public-sector hiring.
Sees this as workforce equity and public-good investment, while noting implementation safeguards are needed.
Cautiously favorable: likes targeted skills training, clear milestones, and public-service return.
Wants fiscal clarity, implementation timelines, and evidence of cost-effectiveness before full endorsement.
Skeptical: supports workforce development but objects to expanded federal role in education, large taxpayer-funded scholarships, and mandated service in government.
Prefers market or state-led solutions and incentive-based approaches.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is non-ideological and programmatic so passage is plausible, but enactment depends on appropriations and floor timing.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Federal funding scope: public investment vs. federal overreach
Content is non-ideological and programmatic so passage is plausible, but enactment depends on appropriations and floor timing.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal program with well-specified eligibility, program elements, obligations, and integration with existing legal frameworks. It assigns c…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.