H.R. 10125 (119th)Bill Overview

NO PROFIT Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Aug 20, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speak…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill bars any person from trading securities, commodities, or contracts in speculative information markets while aware of material, nonpublic information obtained through prioritized access to certain social media accounts controlled by covered government officials, their families, staff, or federal agencies. It also makes it unlawful for social media platforms to knowingly sell or provide prioritized access to communications from those covered accounts, with limited exceptions for public-safety uses and non-discriminatory programmatic/data access.

Why people may split

Regulatory reach: platform regulation seen as necessary fairness vs federal overreach

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive regulatory measure that is relatively well-constructed in statutory terms: it contains detailed definitions, clear prohibitions, mapped enforcement authorities, and limited carve-outs and rulemaking authority.

The bill bars any person from trading securities, commodities, or contracts in speculative information markets while aware of material, nonpublic information obtained through prioritized access to certain social media accounts controlled by covered government officials, their families, staff, or federal agencies.

It also makes it unlawful for social media platforms to knowingly sell or provide prioritized access to communications from those covered accounts, with limited exceptions for public-safety uses and non-discriminatory programmatic/data access.

Enforcement is via the SEC and CFTC (rulemaking and treatment as securities/futures violations) and civil penalties recoverable by the Attorney General equal to revenues from the prioritized access.

Passage35/100

Substantive, novel limits on platform business models and market access generate strong industry and legal pushback; leveraging SEC/CFTC aids feasibility but not enough to offset political resistance.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive regulatory measure that is relatively well-constructed in statutory terms: it contains detailed definitions, clear prohibitions, mapped enforcement authorities, and limited carve-outs and rulemaking authority. It integrates explicitly with existing securities and commodities enforcement frameworks and prescribes penalties for platforms.

Contention68/100

Regulatory reach: platform regulation seen as necessary fairness vs federal overreach

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces opportunities for trading on early government information, promoting fairer financial markets.
  • Potential benefitDeters pay-for-access schemes and privileged information sales tied to officials' social media accounts.
  • Potential benefitClarifies enforcement by directing SEC and CFTC to treat violations as existing statutory offenses.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIncreases compliance costs for social media platforms and data vendors to avoid potential liability.
  • Potential burdenCreates legal uncertainty over what constitutes prioritized access and 'generally available' information.
  • Federal agenciesMay chill communication practices of federal officials and their staff on social media.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Regulatory reach: platform regulation seen as necessary fairness vs federal overreach
Progressive85%

Likely supportive: this targets unequal, paid access to government communications that can create insider trading advantages.

It is viewed as closing a loophole where wealthy or well-connected actors monetize early access to official information.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable: it aims to improve market fairness and prevent privileged access abuses, but raises implementation and regulatory-burden questions.

Support depends on clear rulemaking that balances enforcement, legal standards, and platform compliance costs.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed: views this as federal overreach regulating private platforms and communications, creating heavy penalties and compliance burdens.

Concerned it will chill speech, harm platform business models, and extend regulation past public service into post-employment periods.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Substantive, novel limits on platform business models and market access generate strong industry and legal pushback; leveraging SEC/CFTC aids feasibility but not enough to offset political resistance.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absence of cost estimates and impact analysis
  • Potential constitutional challenges (free speech/association)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Regulatory reach: platform regulation seen as necessary fairness vs federal overreach

Substantive, novel limits on platform business models and market access generate strong industry and legal pushback; leveraging SEC/CFTC ai…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive regulatory measure that is relatively well-constructed in statutory terms: it contains detailed definitions, clear prohibitions, mapped enforcement a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis