Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Amends Section 117 of the Higher Education Act to require that institutions' foreign gift and contract disclosure reports be public and that the Secretary of Education transmit unredacted copies (including foreign source name and address) within 30 days to a list of national security, law enforcement, and research agencies. Requires the Department to transmit prior reports and investigation records to those officials within 90 days.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and chilling effects
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear statutory amendment that prescribes specific new disclosure transmission obligations and a follow-on GAO study.
Amends Section 117 of the Higher Education Act to require that institutions' foreign gift and contract disclosure reports be public and that the Secretary of Education transmit unredacted copies (including foreign source name and address) within 30 days to a list of national security, law enforcement, and research agencies.
Requires the Department to transmit prior reports and investigation records to those officials within 90 days.
Directs the GAO to study interagency coordination on Section 117 implementation and report results within three years.
Narrow, low-cost statutory tweak with national-security framing improves odds in House but Senate procedural hurdles and stakeholder opposition lower overall chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear statutory amendment that prescribes specific new disclosure transmission obligations and a follow-on GAO study. It is explicit about recipients and timelines but omits fiscal, procedural, and protective details needed for robust implementation.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and chilling effects
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and chilling effects
Skeptical overall: supports addressing genuine foreign influence risks but worries this bill risks chilling academic collaboration and donor privacy.
Concerned about retroactive disclosures and broad unredacted sharing with intelligence and law enforcement.
Cautiously supportive if balanced: sees legitimate national security rationale but wants clear safeguards, funding, and narrow scope to avoid unnecessary burdens on research and institutions.
Would favor implementing rules and oversight to prevent mission creep.
Supportive: views the bill as strengthening national security and transparency by ensuring federal agencies see foreign funding quickly.
Sees retroactive reporting and broad interagency access as appropriate for preventing foreign influence.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost statutory tweak with national-security framing improves odds in House but Senate procedural hurdles and stakeholder opposition lower overall chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and chilling effects
Narrow, low-cost statutory tweak with national-security framing improves odds in House but Senate procedural hurdles and stakeholder opposi…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear statutory amendment that prescribes specific new disclosure transmission obligations and a follow-on GAO study. It is explicit about recipients and timelin…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.