H.R. 10192 (119th)Bill Overview

GRANT Reform Act of 2026

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Aug 31, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Requires the Comptroller General (GAO) to publish an annual, publicly available report listing federal grants, recipients, project descriptions, and amounts. Mandates grant recipients, within three months of project completion, to report salary totals, subcontractor names and payments, administrative costs, materials, and unspent funds to GAO.

Why people may split

Support for transparency broadly shared; disagreement on administrative burden

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear reporting framework with specific data elements and deadlines but provides incomplete implementation, resourcing, legal integration, and edge-case protections.

Requires the Comptroller General (GAO) to publish an annual, publicly available report listing federal grants, recipients, project descriptions, and amounts.

Mandates grant recipients, within three months of project completion, to report salary totals, subcontractor names and payments, administrative costs, materials, and unspent funds to GAO.

Noncompliant recipients become ineligible for future federal grants until they comply.

Passage45/100

Modest, administratively focused bill with limited fiscal impact—plausible bipartisan appeal but material stakeholder resistance and Senate procedures reduce probability.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear reporting framework with specific data elements and deadlines but provides incomplete implementation, resourcing, legal integration, and edge-case protections.

Contention35/100

Support for transparency broadly shared; disagreement on administrative burden

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesCities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases public transparency about how Federal grant dollars are allocated and spent.
  • Potential benefitProvides Congress and watchdogs with standardized grant data for oversight and fraud detection.
  • Potential benefitMay improve policy decisions by enabling evaluation of project outcomes linked to funding amounts.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes additional reporting and administrative burden on grant recipients, especially small organizations.
  • Potential burdenMay disclose sensitive salary or subcontractor information, raising privacy or proprietary concerns.
  • CitiesRisk that ineligibility penalties could reduce services if organizations miss filings due to capacity limits.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Support for transparency broadly shared; disagreement on administrative burden
Progressive75%

Generally supportive of increased transparency and accountability for federal spending, while cautious about burdens on nonprofits and privacy risks.

Wants safeguards for sensitive information, technical assistance for small grantees, and attention to equity implications.

May condition strong support on protections and implementation details.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Favors transparency and accountability but emphasizes practical implementation and cost control.

Sees value in GAO reporting if OMB guidance is clear and compliance burdens are minimized.

Wants phased rollout, templates, and a proportionate penalty structure.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Strongly favorable toward greater transparency and revealing how taxpayer funds are used.

Views GAO reporting and recipient-level disclosures as tools to prevent waste and expose partisan or inefficient spending.

May seek even tougher enforcement and wider public accessibility.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Modest, administratively focused bill with limited fiscal impact—plausible bipartisan appeal but material stakeholder resistance and Senate procedures reduce probability.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Estimated GAO and agency implementation costs absent
  • Degree of pushback from universities, nonprofits, and state governments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Support for transparency broadly shared; disagreement on administrative burden

Modest, administratively focused bill with limited fiscal impact—plausible bipartisan appeal but material stakeholder resistance and Senate…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear reporting framework with specific data elements and deadlines but provides incomplete implementation, resourcing, legal integration, and edge-case…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis