H.R. 1030 (119th)Bill Overview

Flight 293 Remembrance Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityAviation and airports
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for con…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Flight 293 Remembrance Act requires the Secretary of Defense, with VA consultation, to identify non‑combat military plane crashes categorized as Operational Loss/Non‑War Loss (starting with 1984 records, earlier crashes via other sources), create a public database of service members who died in those crashes, provide targeted assistance and a designated DoD point of contact for affected families, consult outside experts, and report to Congress within two years. The bill also applies certain federal nondiscrimination requirements to programs funded under the Act and directs agencies to issue implementing regulations.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize strong funding, inclusivity, and privacy safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear administrative obligations for the Department of Defense (in consultation with VA) to identify non‑combat military plane crashes, create a public database, provide family assistance, appoint a designated point of contact, and report to Congress.

The Flight 293 Remembrance Act requires the Secretary of Defense, with VA consultation, to identify non‑combat military plane crashes categorized as Operational Loss/Non‑War Loss (starting with 1984 records, earlier crashes via other sources), create a public database of service members who died in those crashes, provide targeted assistance and a designated DoD point of contact for affected families, consult outside experts, and report to Congress within two years.

The bill also applies certain federal nondiscrimination requirements to programs funded under the Act and directs agencies to issue implementing regulations.

Passage40/100

Substantively modest and bipartisan-leaning, but administrative costs, privacy or legal technicalities and legislative calendar compete with priorities.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear administrative obligations for the Department of Defense (in consultation with VA) to identify non‑combat military plane crashes, create a public database, provide family assistance, appoint a designated point of contact, and report to Congress. It sets reasonable timelines for initial deliverables and specifies report contents and nondiscrimination applicability.

Contention30/100

Liberals emphasize strong funding, inclusivity, and privacy safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates a centralized public record improving historical documentation and transparency of non-combat aviation losses.
  • Potential benefitProvides families personalized help navigating benefits, likely increasing benefit uptake and access.
  • Federal agenciesEstablishes a single DoD point of contact to streamline interagency coordination for survivors.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenPublic database may raise privacy and consent concerns for families of the deceased.
  • Potential burdenImplementing identification, outreach, and database maintenance will impose administrative costs on DoD and VA.
  • Potential burdenNondiscrimination reclassification could impose new compliance obligations across assisted programs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize strong funding, inclusivity, and privacy safeguards
Progressive90%

Generally supportive.

Sees the bill as acknowledging families of non‑combat losses, improving benefits access, and increasing transparency.

Would push for strong implementation, funding, privacy protections, and inclusive outreach.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Cautiously supportive.

Approves objectives—supporting families and transparency—but wants clear cost estimates, timelines, and legal clarity about the nondiscrimination enforcement approach.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Generally favorable to honoring fallen service members but wary of expanded federal bureaucracy, regulatory implications, and new ongoing costs.

May seek limits on scope and clearer protections for privacy and state roles.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Substantively modest and bipartisan-leaning, but administrative costs, privacy or legal technicalities and legislative calendar compete with priorities.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No explicit funding or authorization level included
  • Availability and reliability of records, especially pre-1984
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize strong funding, inclusivity, and privacy safeguards

Substantively modest and bipartisan-leaning, but administrative costs, privacy or legal technicalities and legislative calendar compete wit…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear administrative obligations for the Department of Defense (in consultation with VA) to identify non‑combat military plane crashes, create a public da…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis