Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill (Voter Eligibility Verification Act of 2025) would require the Department of Homeland Security to provide verification or status information, including immigration status for individuals on lists of potential voters, to a State Attorney General or Secretary of State within 15 days of a request. It amends 8 U.S.C. 1373(c) to mandate prompt federal responses to such state requests.
Progressives emphasize voter suppression and misclassification risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a statutory obligation for DHS to disclose citizenship/immigration status information to certain State officials within a fixed deadline, but it provides limited procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail.
The bill (Voter Eligibility Verification Act of 2025) would require the Department of Homeland Security to provide verification or status information, including immigration status for individuals on lists of potential voters, to a State Attorney General or Secretary of State within 15 days of a request.
It amends 8 U.S.C. 1373(c) to mandate prompt federal responses to such state requests.
Short, targeted change faces strong partisan and legal resistance in a chamber requiring broad agreement; executive and court challenges likely.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a statutory obligation for DHS to disclose citizenship/immigration status information to certain State officials within a fixed deadline, but it provides limited procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail.
Progressives emphasize voter suppression and misclassification risks.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize voter suppression and misclassification risks.
Likely strongly opposed.
The persona would view the bill as creating a federal channel that could be used to challenge or remove eligible voters, disproportionately affecting immigrants and minority communities.
They would focus on privacy, database error risks, and potential for voter suppression.
Mixed and cautious.
The persona would see legitimate goals for election integrity but worry about implementation, accuracy, cost, and civil rights protections.
They would want narrowly tailored rules, oversight, and funding for reliable verification and remedies for errors.
Generally supportive.
The persona would view the bill as strengthening election integrity by giving states timely access to federal immigration-status data to remove ineligible voters.
They would emphasize promptness and federal cooperation with state officials.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Short, targeted change faces strong partisan and legal resistance in a chamber requiring broad agreement; executive and court challenges likely.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize voter suppression and misclassification risks.
Short, targeted change faces strong partisan and legal resistance in a chamber requiring broad agreement; executive and court challenges li…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a statutory obligation for DHS to disclose citizenship/immigration status information to certain State officials within a fixed deadline, but it p…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.