Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey about 3,400 acres of BLM-managed land in La Paz County, Arizona, to La Paz County for fair market value. The conveyance is exempted from certain FLPMA planning requirements, excludes lands with significant cultural, environmental, wildlife, or recreational resources, withdraws the land from mining and mineral leasing laws, and requires the county to pay appraised value and all conveyance costs.
Concern about waiver of FLPMA planning versus desire for expedited conveyance
Narrow local conveyance with no federal cost and clear protections; historically easier in the House.
The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey about 3,400 acres of BLM-managed land in La Paz County, Arizona, to La Paz County for fair market value.
The conveyance is exempted from certain FLPMA planning requirements, excludes lands with significant cultural, environmental, wildlife, or recreational resources, withdraws the land from mining and mineral leasing laws, and requires the county to pay appraised value and all conveyance costs.
The county and future owners must make good-faith efforts to avoid and minimize disturbance to tribal artifacts, coordinate with the Colorado River Indian Tribes Tribal Historic Preservation Office, and allow reburial of unearthed artifacts.
Content is narrow and fiscally neutral with mitigation measures, but subject-matter controversies and Senate procedures create uncertainty.
How solid the drafting looks.
Concern about waiver of FLPMA planning versus desire for expedited conveyance
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Concern about waiver of FLPMA planning versus desire for expedited conveyance
Supportive of renewable energy and local job creation in principle, but cautious about bypassing FLPMA planning and environmental safeguards.
Concerned whether tribal protections and environmental exclusions are strong enough and whether public interests are properly protected.
Views the transfer skeptically unless strict conditions and ongoing protections are enforced.
Sees pragmatic value in conveying land for local economic development if paid at fair market value.
Appreciates built-in tribal coordination and exclusion for sensitive resources, but notes the waiver of FLPMA planning requires careful safeguards.
Likely to support the bill if transparency, clear appraisal, and environmental protections are enforced.
Favorable toward returning federal land to local control to promote economic development and reduce federal management burden.
Likes that county pays fair market value and administrative costs, and that mining leasing is withdrawn to clarify land use.
May want even fewer federal constraints and quicker conveyance.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and fiscally neutral with mitigation measures, but subject-matter controversies and Senate procedures create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Concern about waiver of FLPMA planning versus desire for expedited conveyance
Content is narrow and fiscally neutral with mitigation measures, but subject-matter controversies and Senate procedures create uncertainty.
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.