H.R. 1045 (119th)Bill Overview

Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025

Public Lands and Natural Resources|EcologyFires
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 236.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to add the State of Utah as an additional location for an Institute established under that Act. It makes a conforming amendment to include Utah in the statutory list of states authorized to have such an Institute.

Why people may split

Liberals stress climate adaptation and community equity benefits

Watch point

Text shows House passage; narrow, noncontroversial amendment would face minimal resistance.

This bill amends the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to add the State of Utah as an additional location for an Institute established under that Act.

It makes a conforming amendment to include Utah in the statutory list of states authorized to have such an Institute.

Passage65/100

Narrow, administrative amendment with low controversy and no explicit new spending; main remaining barrier is Senate consideration and funding clarity.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention45/100

Liberals stress climate adaptation and community equity benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesCreates a federal-recognized wildfire research institute focused on Utah's ecosystems and risks.
  • Local governmentsMay improve local wildfire science, fuels management, and evidence-based mitigation practices.
  • Potential benefitCould generate research and administrative jobs tied to institute establishment and operations.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAdds federal program responsibilities that likely require new appropriations or reprogramming of funds.
  • StatesMay duplicate or overlap with existing state, university, or private wildfire research efforts.
  • Federal agenciesCould shift limited federal resources among regional institutes, affecting other States' programs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress climate adaptation and community equity benefits
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because it expands federal wildfire research and prevention capacity in a high-risk Western state.

Would view this as a climate adaptation and community-resilience measure, while noting the bill lacks funding and equity details.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious; appreciates targeted expansion of research capacity using an existing statutory mechanism.

Would want clarity about costs, oversight, and measurable outcomes before full endorsement.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Mixed to somewhat skeptical: supports wildfire prevention in principle but worries about federal expansion, new spending, and possible regulatory consequences.

Prefers state-led solutions and strict limits on federal roles.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, administrative amendment with low controversy and no explicit new spending; main remaining barrier is Senate consideration and funding clarity.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No appropriation or cost estimate provided
  • Implementing agency and timeline not specified in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress climate adaptation and community equity benefits

Narrow, administrative amendment with low controversy and no explicit new spending; main remaining barrier is Senate consideration and fund…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis