Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill amends 54 U.S.C. §200306(c) to increase the share and dollar cap available for recreational public access on Federal land, changing the percentage from 3 percent to 10 percent and raising the dollar amount from $15,000,000 to $50,000,000.
Left emphasizes equity and public-health benefits; right emphasizes federal spending concerns.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that precisely specifies the textual changes to existing law but provides minimal contextual, fiscal, implementation, or oversight detail.
This bill amends 54 U.S.C. §200306(c) to increase the share and dollar cap available for recreational public access on Federal land, changing the percentage from 3 percent to 10 percent and raising the dollar amount from $15,000,000 to $50,000,000.
Narrow, non-ideological funding tweak with modest fiscal impact is relatively likely to pass, though dependent on appropriations packaging and Senate procedures.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that precisely specifies the textual changes to existing law but provides minimal contextual, fiscal, implementation, or oversight detail.
Left emphasizes equity and public-health benefits; right emphasizes federal spending concerns.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes equity and public-health benefits; right emphasizes federal spending concerns.
Likely supportive because the bill increases federal resources for public recreational access.
Sees potential to expand equitable outdoor opportunities, but will watch for environmental protections and equitable distribution.
Generally favorable if costs are justified and administration is accountable.
Views this as a modest expansion of recreational funding that should include oversight and measurable outcomes.
Skeptical about expanding federal spending and authority, though supportive of public access in principle.
Concerned about federal overreach, cost, and impacts on property or resource management.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, non-ideological funding tweak with modest fiscal impact is relatively likely to pass, though dependent on appropriations packaging and Senate procedures.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes equity and public-health benefits; right emphasizes federal spending concerns.
Narrow, non-ideological funding tweak with modest fiscal impact is relatively likely to pass, though dependent on appropriations packaging…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that precisely specifies the textual changes to existing law but provides minimal contextual, fiscal, implementation, or o…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.