Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H607)
Establishes a Great Lakes Gateways Network and Watertrails led by the Secretary of the Interior with EPA cooperation. Authorizes a grants assistance program (up to 50% federal share, 10% admin cap) for state/local governments, nonprofits, and private sector projects.
Appropriate funding level and program scale
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive policy program establishing a Great Lakes Gateways Network and a grants assistance program with explicit objectives, assigned lead agencies, and an authorization of appropriations.
Establishes a Great Lakes Gateways Network and Watertrails led by the Secretary of the Interior with EPA cooperation.
Authorizes a grants assistance program (up to 50% federal share, 10% admin cap) for state/local governments, nonprofits, and private sector projects.
Identifies eligible components, requires eligibility criteria, and authorizes $6,000,000 annually for FY2026–2031.
Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations and legislative calendar.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive policy program establishing a Great Lakes Gateways Network and a grants assistance program with explicit objectives, assigned lead agencies, and an authorization of appropriations. It provides basic funding and structural elements but delegates substantial operational detail to agencies and omits statutory provisions commonly expected for program oversight, integration with existing authorities, and implementation timing.
Appropriate funding level and program scale
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Appropriate funding level and program scale
Generally supportive: advances conservation, public access, cultural preservation, and environmental education around the Great Lakes.
Would want stronger funding, equity, and tribal/community engagement measures.
Cautious support: sees local economic and recreational benefits, but wants clear accountability, measurable outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Prefers careful implementation and intergovernmental coordination.
Skeptical: views this as additional federal spending and regional earmark.
May support local economic gains but objects to expanding federal programmatic roles.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations and legislative calendar.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Appropriate funding level and program scale
Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive policy program establishing a Great Lakes Gateways Network and a grants assistance program with explicit objectives, assigned lead agencies, and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.