H.R. 1073 (119th)Bill Overview

Great Lakes Gateways Network Act of 2025

Public Lands and Natural Resources|CanadaEnvironmental education
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H607)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Establishes a Great Lakes Gateways Network and Watertrails led by the Secretary of the Interior with EPA cooperation. Authorizes a grants assistance program (up to 50% federal share, 10% admin cap) for state/local governments, nonprofits, and private sector projects.

Why people may split

Appropriate funding level and program scale

Watch point

Small, regional conservation bill with modest cost and bipartisan appeal; still requires appropriations and floor time.

Establishes a Great Lakes Gateways Network and Watertrails led by the Secretary of the Interior with EPA cooperation.

Authorizes a grants assistance program (up to 50% federal share, 10% admin cap) for state/local governments, nonprofits, and private sector projects.

Identifies eligible components, requires eligibility criteria, and authorizes $6,000,000 annually for FY2026–2031.

Passage70/100

Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations and legislative calendar.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention58/100

Appropriate funding level and program scale

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies · Cities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal grants and technical assistance for conserving and restoring Great Lakes resources.
  • Potential benefitSupports development of watertrails and gateway infrastructure that could boost regional tourism and recreation.
  • Local governmentsLeverages non-Federal matching funds to amplify local investment in projects.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAdds federal spending of $6 million annually from 2026 through 2031, increasing budgetary commitments.
  • Potential burdenLimited authorized funding may be insufficient for comprehensive restoration across the entire Great Lakes region.
  • CitiesThe 50 percent matching requirement could disadvantage cash-strapped communities with limited funds or in-kind capacity.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Appropriate funding level and program scale
Progressive85%

Generally supportive: advances conservation, public access, cultural preservation, and environmental education around the Great Lakes.

Would want stronger funding, equity, and tribal/community engagement measures.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautious support: sees local economic and recreational benefits, but wants clear accountability, measurable outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

Prefers careful implementation and intergovernmental coordination.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical: views this as additional federal spending and regional earmark.

May support local economic gains but objects to expanding federal programmatic roles.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations and legislative calendar.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate included
  • Competition for limited appropriations funding
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Appropriate funding level and program scale

Modest budget, clear implementable design, and regional constituency support raise likelihood; ultimate outcome depends on appropriations a…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Great Lakes Gateways Network Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis