Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude property and facilities located on USDA-defined "prime farmland" from multiple federal renewable energy tax incentives. Affected credits include the residential clean energy credit, production tax credits, the energy investment credit, and the clean electricity investment and production credits.
Climate advocates prioritize renewable deployment; conservatives prioritize farmland protection.
Relatively narrow and administrable but likely to draw opposition from renewable stakeholders and regional allies.
The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude property and facilities located on USDA-defined "prime farmland" from multiple federal renewable energy tax incentives.
Affected credits include the residential clean energy credit, production tax credits, the energy investment credit, and the clean electricity investment and production credits.
The exclusions apply to property or facilities placed in service after enactment, with one investment credit provision tied to construction start dates. "Prime farmland" is defined by reference to the Secretary of Agriculture and 7 C.F.R. part 657.5.
Narrow but controversial restriction on federal clean-energy incentives; limited compromise features and likely pushback reduce chances of enactment.
How solid the drafting looks.
Climate advocates prioritize renewable deployment; conservatives prioritize farmland protection.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Climate advocates prioritize renewable deployment; conservatives prioritize farmland protection.
Likely opposed overall because removing incentives will slow renewable deployment and harm climate goals.
Some appreciation for protecting productive farmland exists, but climate and rapid clean-energy scale-up are higher priorities.
Concerns about loss of jobs and investment in rural clean energy are probable.
Mixed reaction: appreciates protecting high-quality farmland while recognizing risks to renewable deployment.
Seeks balance between agricultural preservation and clean energy targets.
Would look for narrowly tailored definitions and administrative clarity to avoid unintended consequences.
Generally supportive because it limits federal subsidies driving conversion of prime farmland.
Values farmland protection and reduced federal incentivization of commercial solar on productive acreage.
Some caution about property-owner freedom and local economic opportunities, but protection of agriculture is a strong priority.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow but controversial restriction on federal clean-energy incentives; limited compromise features and likely pushback reduce chances of enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Climate advocates prioritize renewable deployment; conservatives prioritize farmland protection.
Narrow but controversial restriction on federal clean-energy incentives; limited compromise features and likely pushback reduce chances of…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for No Solar Panels on Fertile Farmland Act of 2025.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.