H.R. 1105 (119th)Bill Overview

Disaster Resiliency and Coverage Act of 2025

Emergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill creates an Individual Household Disaster Mitigation Program under the Stafford Act to provide grants to States and Indian tribes for pre-disaster mitigation on at-risk residential households. It directs the President (through FEMA and the Federal Insurance Office) to define eligible disaster areas, set mitigation standards, convene an advisory committee, and require State plans assessing insurance availability.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity and stronger public funding; conservatives fear federal overreach

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly articulated substantive policy: a new individual household disaster mitigation grant program with detailed lists of eligible activities and linked tax provisions.

This bill creates an Individual Household Disaster Mitigation Program under the Stafford Act to provide grants to States and Indian tribes for pre-disaster mitigation on at-risk residential households.

It directs the President (through FEMA and the Federal Insurance Office) to define eligible disaster areas, set mitigation standards, convene an advisory committee, and require State plans assessing insurance availability.

The bill caps household grants at $10,000 (CPI-adjusted), bars grants for individuals above specified AGI thresholds, enumerates qualifying mitigation activities, and adds related tax code changes: exclusion of grant amounts from gross income, a 30% tax credit for mitigation expenditures, and other conforming provisions.

Passage40/100

Substantive, technically framed mitigation bill with bipartisan potential, but fiscal cost, tax changes, and Senate hurdles reduce odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly articulated substantive policy: a new individual household disaster mitigation grant program with detailed lists of eligible activities and linked tax provisions. It assigns responsibilities to federal agencies and requires state plans and an advisory committee, providing a moderate degree of operational specificity.

Contention65/100

Liberals emphasize equity and stronger public funding; conservatives fear federal overreach

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSupports household-level mitigation investments, potentially reducing future property damage and recovery costs.
  • Potential benefitLikely increases demand for construction, retrofit, and mitigation-related jobs and businesses.
  • Potential benefitProvides tax exclusions and a 30% credit, incentivizing private spending on mitigation measures.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates additional federal and State administrative and regulatory workload to certify areas and manage grants.
  • Federal agenciesGenerates federal budgetary costs from grants and foregone revenue due to tax exclusions and credits.
  • Potential burdenThe $10,000 per-household cap may be inadequate for many meaningful mitigation projects.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity and stronger public funding; conservatives fear federal overreach
Progressive85%

Overall supportive: advances proactive resilience, targets funding to households, and connects mitigation to insurance affordability.

Likely to praise the program's focus on pre-disaster spending and inclusion of nature-based and fire-resilience measures.

May criticize the relatively small per-household cap and seek stronger guarantees of equity for low-income and frontline communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautious support: a policy-oriented, federally guided but state-administered mitigation program that uses technical standards and stakeholder input.

Appreciates income targeting, tax incentives, and multi-tiered standards, but concerned about costs, administrative complexity, and measurable insurance market effects.

Would look for clear performance metrics and budget offsets.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical: welcomes homeowner risk reduction but concerned about federal expansion, cost, and market interference.

Appreciates incentives but sees grants and tax expenditures as federal spending that may distort private markets.

Likely to push for state control, limited federal role, and protection of insurer underwriting autonomy.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Substantive, technically framed mitigation bill with bipartisan potential, but fiscal cost, tax changes, and Senate hurdles reduce odds.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No authorization or appropriation level specified
  • Absent CBO score or estimated revenue effects
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity and stronger public funding; conservatives fear federal overreach

Substantive, technically framed mitigation bill with bipartisan potential, but fiscal cost, tax changes, and Senate hurdles reduce odds.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly articulated substantive policy: a new individual household disaster mitigation grant program with detailed lists of eligible activities and link…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis