Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
This bill amends the America COMPETES Act to require uniform scientific integrity policies at all federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research. It sets deadlines for agency adoption, requires a career Scientific Integrity Officer, training, reporting, OSTP approval and oversight, whistleblower and appeals procedures, and periodic reviews including a GAO evaluation.
Liberals emphasize anti-politicization and whistleblower protections
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that clearly defines purpose, assigns responsibilities, and sets timelines and reporting requirements to institutionalize scientific integrity policies across covered agencies.
This bill amends the America COMPETES Act to require uniform scientific integrity policies at all federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research.
It sets deadlines for agency adoption, requires a career Scientific Integrity Officer, training, reporting, OSTP approval and oversight, whistleblower and appeals procedures, and periodic reviews including a GAO evaluation.
Moderate likelihood: narrow administrative reform with built-in flexibility and low fiscal impact, but subject-matter sensitivity and oversight provisions could slow or modify enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that clearly defines purpose, assigns responsibilities, and sets timelines and reporting requirements to institutionalize scientific integrity policies across covered agencies. It integrates with existing statutory frameworks and builds multiple oversight touchpoints.
Liberals emphasize anti-politicization and whistleblower protections
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize anti-politicization and whistleblower protections
Likely broadly supportive; seen as strengthening protections against political interference in federally funded science and improving transparency.
Values the whistleblower provisions, public reporting, OSTP oversight, and training to restore public trust in science.
Generally favorable but pragmatic concerns about execution, timelines, and tradeoffs.
Sees value in standardization and transparency but wants clarity on classified work, administrative burden, and alignment with existing merit system law.
Skeptical and somewhat opposed; views the bill as adding federal bureaucracy and centralizing control over agency decisionmaking.
Concerned it could constrain political leadership and be used to challenge policy choices legally or politically.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Moderate likelihood: narrow administrative reform with built-in flexibility and low fiscal impact, but subject-matter sensitivity and oversight provisions could slow or modify enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize anti-politicization and whistleblower protections
Moderate likelihood: narrow administrative reform with built-in flexibility and low fiscal impact, but subject-matter sensitivity and overs…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that clearly defines purpose, assigns responsibilities, and sets timelines and reporting requirements to insti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.