Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This bill directs the OMB, with several federal agencies, to produce standards requiring removal of the “DeepSeek” application (and successors by High Flyer) from executive agency information technology within 60 days. The standards must include exceptions for law enforcement, national security, and security researchers, and require documented risk mitigation for any authorized uses.
Liberals demand transparency and limits on secrecy exceptions.
Narrow, administrable policy with low fiscal impact could attract bipartisan support, though vendor-specific naming may provoke some opposition.
This bill directs the OMB, with several federal agencies, to produce standards requiring removal of the “DeepSeek” application (and successors by High Flyer) from executive agency information technology within 60 days.
The standards must include exceptions for law enforcement, national security, and security researchers, and require documented risk mitigation for any authorized uses.
Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding passage in House, but vendor-specific prohibition and procedural hurdles make final enactment uncertain.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals demand transparency and limits on secrecy exceptions.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals demand transparency and limits on secrecy exceptions.
Generally supportive because it protects government systems, employee data, and civil servants from potential security or privacy risks.
Would press for transparency about the risk assessment, public reporting, and limits on exceptions to avoid secrecy or mission creep.
Cautiously favorable as a targeted, limited government-device security measure, but wants clear evidence, defined standards, and nonpartisan criteria to avoid arbitrary application.
Would seek precise timelines and cost/implementation guidance.
Likely supportive on national-security grounds and prudent restriction of potentially risky apps on government devices.
Some conservatives may prefer a broader ban covering contractors or consumer use, or stronger actions against the vendor.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding passage in House, but vendor-specific prohibition and procedural hurdles make final enactment uncertain.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals demand transparency and limits on secrecy exceptions.
Content is narrow and low-cost, aiding passage in House, but vendor-specific prohibition and procedural hurdles make final enactment uncert…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.