H.R. 1159 (119th)Bill Overview

Honoring Our Fallen TSA Officers Act

Transportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill (Honoring Our Fallen TSA Officers Act) amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add Transportation Security Administration employees to the list of individuals eligible for public safety officers’ death benefits when performing TSA duties related to protecting the Nation’s transportation systems. The change is made effective for injuries sustained on or after October 31, 2013.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize correcting inequity and honoring families

Watch point

Narrow, sympathetic expansion of death benefits typically attracts bipartisan support in the House.

This bill (Honoring Our Fallen TSA Officers Act) amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to add Transportation Security Administration employees to the list of individuals eligible for public safety officers’ death benefits when performing TSA duties related to protecting the Nation’s transportation systems.

The change is made effective for injuries sustained on or after October 31, 2013.

Passage65/100

Narrow, symbolic, and administrable benefit expansion with bipartisan appeal; retroactive cost uncertainty modestly reduces probability.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention28/100

Progressives emphasize correcting inequity and honoring families

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides families of deceased TSA officers access to federal public safety officers' death benefits.
  • Federal agenciesTreats TSA officers similarly to other public safety officers regarding federal recognition and benefits.
  • Potential benefitOffers direct financial support to survivors, reducing immediate economic hardship after an officer's death.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExpands federal benefit obligations, increasing federal program expenditures modestly.
  • Potential burdenRetroactive application may generate administrative workload and delays processing backdated claims.
  • Federal agenciesPotential overlap with other federal death benefits could raise duplication and coordination questions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize correcting inequity and honoring families
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The bill extends an established federal benefit to TSA officers performing protective duties, treating them similarly to other public safety personnel.

Retroactive coverage for injuries since 2013 is seen as correcting an inequity for families.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but pragmatic about implementation and cost.

Approves of extending death benefits to TSA officers, while wanting clear eligibility rules, fiscal estimates, and administrative guidance to avoid unintended expansion or delays.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautious to mixed support.

While honoring fallen security personnel is viewed positively, concern centers on expanding federal benefit programs, retroactive liabilities, and potential precedent for other federal workforce expansions.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, symbolic, and administrable benefit expansion with bipartisan appeal; retroactive cost uncertainty modestly reduces probability.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate included
  • Unknown scale of retroactive claim payments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize correcting inequity and honoring families

Narrow, symbolic, and administrable benefit expansion with bipartisan appeal; retroactive cost uncertainty modestly reduces probability.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Honoring Our Fallen TSA Officers Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis