Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Beginning October 1, 2027, the bill bars the Department of Homeland Security from obligating funds to procure batteries produced by named foreign companies and entities on certain export, forced-labor, or Chinese military-related lists, plus their subsidiaries or successors. "Produced by" includes final assembly or majority-component provision. The Secretary may grant waivers after an affirmative assessment of no security/data/infrastructure risk and lack of alternatives of similar cost and quality, or for research/testing; Congress must be notified of waivers.
Progressives emphasize human-rights and domestic industrial investment.
Narrow national‑security procurement restriction with waivers and reporting; historically easier to pass in the originating chamber.
Beginning October 1, 2027, the bill bars the Department of Homeland Security from obligating funds to procure batteries produced by named foreign companies and entities on certain export, forced-labor, or Chinese military-related lists, plus their subsidiaries or successors. "Produced by" includes final assembly or majority-component provision.
The Secretary may grant waivers after an affirmative assessment of no security/data/infrastructure risk and lack of alternatives of similar cost and quality, or for research/testing; Congress must be notified of waivers.
DHS must report within 180 days after enactment on anticipated mission and cost impacts across listed components.
Content is narrow and securitized (helps passage), but Senate procedural obstacles and potential industry/legal pushback reduce overall likelihood.
How solid the drafting looks.
Progressives emphasize human-rights and domestic industrial investment.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize human-rights and domestic industrial investment.
Likely supportive overall because it reduces reliance on firms tied to forced labor and potential foreign adversary influence.
Will stress the need for transparency, human-rights considerations, and parallel investment in ethical, domestic supply chains.
Concerned about cost, operational readiness, and environmental/climate impacts if alternatives delay clean-technology deployment.
Cautiously supportive if implementation safeguards protect DHS operations and budgets.
Views national-security rationale as legitimate but will prioritize clear cost estimates, timelines, and pragmatic waiver use to avoid readiness gaps.
Wants the 180-day report to be detailed and actionable.
Generally supportive as a targeted step to decouple government procurement from Chinese and adversary-linked firms for national security.
Sees the ban as warranted and consistent with defense-first procurement priorities, while accepting waivers for operational necessity.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and securitized (helps passage), but Senate procedural obstacles and potential industry/legal pushback reduce overall likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize human-rights and domestic industrial investment.
Content is narrow and securitized (helps passage), but Senate procedural obstacles and potential industry/legal pushback reduce overall lik…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.