H.R. 1192 (119th)Bill Overview

To ensure that Big Cypress National Preserve may not be designated as wilderness or as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|FloridaParks, recreation areas, trails
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill prohibits Big Cypress National Preserve from ever being designated as wilderness or added to the National Wilderness Preservation System. It contains a single operative provision that bars wilderness designation for the Preserve, without specifying alternative management changes.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize lost long-term conservation protections

Watch point

Narrow, simple text aids House consideration; local delegation support would help but environmental opposition may raise resistance.

This bill prohibits Big Cypress National Preserve from ever being designated as wilderness or added to the National Wilderness Preservation System.

It contains a single operative provision that bars wilderness designation for the Preserve, without specifying alternative management changes.

Passage35/100

Very narrow and administratively simple but politically sensitive; success depends on local support, Senate buy-in, and executive stance.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize lost long-term conservation protections

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsMaintains current recreational and motorized access and uses relied upon by local communities and businesses.
  • Potential benefitPreserves economic activity from hunting, fishing, airboat tours, and other outdoor recreation.
  • Potential benefitAvoids regulatory restrictions from wilderness designation that would prohibit motorized equipment and new infrastructu…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesPrevents establishment of long-term federal wilderness protections for habitat, biodiversity, and watershed conservatio…
  • Potential burdenMay increase risk of development, habitat fragmentation, and declines in ecological resilience over time.
  • Potential burdenUndermines the integrity and completeness of the National Wilderness Preservation System.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize lost long-term conservation protections
Progressive15%

Likely to view the bill negatively as a rollback of a potential high-level conservation tool.

They would worry it removes a durable legal protection for habitat, species, and hydrologic connectivity in a sensitive landscape.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed.

Appreciates protecting current local uses and avoiding abrupt new federal restrictions, but concerned about long-term conservation and reputational consequences.

Would look for procedural safeguards and compromise measures.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive.

Sees the bill as protecting local access, recreational uses, and management flexibility by preventing restrictive wilderness designation.

Views it as limiting federal overreach and preserving economic activity.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Very narrow and administratively simple but politically sensitive; success depends on local support, Senate buy-in, and executive stance.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of support from state delegation and affected local stakeholders
  • Whether conservation groups will mount organized opposition
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize lost long-term conservation protections

Very narrow and administratively simple but politically sensitive; success depends on local support, Senate buy-in, and executive stance.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To ensure that Big Cypress National Preserve may not be design…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis