H.R. 126 (119th)Bill Overview

Original Students Voicing Opinions in Today’s Elections (VOTE) Act

Government Operations and Politics|Civics educationEducation programs funding
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to run a FY2025 pilot program funding local educational agencies to provide voter registration information to 12th‑grade students. Eligible LEAs apply with a plan, budget, and assurances; recipients must consult state and local election officials and report on activities and effectiveness.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes youth enfranchisement and civic benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear and narrowly-scoped substantive policy change by authorizing an EAC-run FY2025 pilot to fund local educational agencies to provide voter registration information to 12th graders, but it leaves many operational and evaluative details unspecified.

This bill directs the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to run a FY2025 pilot program funding local educational agencies to provide voter registration information to 12th‑grade students.

Eligible LEAs apply with a plan, budget, and assurances; recipients must consult state and local election officials and report on activities and effectiveness.

The EAC must compile and submit a report to Congress.

Passage40/100

Substantively modest and administratively clear, but election-policy sensitivity and need for appropriations reduce standalone prospects; more likely if included in a larger package.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear and narrowly-scoped substantive policy change by authorizing an EAC-run FY2025 pilot to fund local educational agencies to provide voter registration information to 12th graders, but it leaves many operational and evaluative details unspecified.

Contention62/100

Liberal emphasizes youth enfranchisement and civic benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesCreates a federal pilot funding stream for LEAs to provide voter registration information to 12th graders.
  • Local governmentsEncourages coordination with state and local election officials to improve information accuracy and relevance.
  • Potential benefitMay increase youth awareness of registration procedures before graduation, possibly raising registration rates.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal involvement in school-based voter outreach, raising potential federal-versus-state authority question…
  • Potential burdenShort reporting timelines and administrative requirements could impose burdens on already stretched LEA staff.
  • Federal agenciesAuthorizes open-ended appropriations, creating uncertainty about total federal spending and budgetary trade-offs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes youth enfranchisement and civic benefits
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive: expands youth civic engagement and reduces barriers to voter registration before graduation.

Seen as a modest, targeted federal effort to boost turnout among young people.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: appreciates pilot scope and reporting requirements.

Wants clarity about costs, nonpartisanship, and measurable outcomes before wider rollout.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical: concerned about federal agency involvement in schools and potential politicization.

Some conservatives may accept a strictly nonpartisan, limited pilot; others will oppose federal intrusion into local education.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Substantively modest and administratively clear, but election-policy sensitivity and need for appropriations reduce standalone prospects; more likely if included in a larger package.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Funding level unspecified
  • Potential partisan objections to school-based voter outreach
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes youth enfranchisement and civic benefits

Substantively modest and administratively clear, but election-policy sensitivity and need for appropriations reduce standalone prospects; m…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear and narrowly-scoped substantive policy change by authorizing an EAC-run FY2025 pilot to fund local educational agencies to provide voter registrat…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis