Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
This bill amends Section 1446 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act to (1) explicitly authorize scholarships for programs leading to bachelor or graduate degrees at 1890 land-grant institutions; (2) require mandatory annual funding of $15,000,000 from the Commodity Credit Corporation beginning in fiscal year 2025, available until expended; and (3) make previously time-limited discretionary funding and academic-year provisions ongoing rather than limited to specific years.
Liberal emphasizes equity and HBCU investment benefits
Narrow, constituency‑focused funding change likely to find bipartisan support in committee and on the floor.
This bill amends Section 1446 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act to (1) explicitly authorize scholarships for programs leading to bachelor or graduate degrees at 1890 land-grant institutions; (2) require mandatory annual funding of $15,000,000 from the Commodity Credit Corporation beginning in fiscal year 2025, available until expended; and (3) make previously time-limited discretionary funding and academic-year provisions ongoing rather than limited to specific years.
Modest, well‑targeted funding increase with administrative clarity increases odds, though mandatory CCC funding and lack of offsets create some resistance.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberal emphasizes equity and HBCU investment benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes equity and HBCU investment benefits
Likely supportive because the bill provides predictable, ongoing funding for scholarships at 1890 institutions, expanding access including graduate study.
It aligns with priorities to strengthen Historically Black Land-Grant Universities and educational equity.
Generally favorable but cautious: the bill creates stable funding for workforce and higher-education goals while adding permanent mandatory spending.
Support likely if oversight, cost controls, and performance metrics are included.
Skeptical overall: while acknowledging support for agricultural colleges, this creates ongoing mandatory spending via the CCC and expands federal involvement in higher education.
Preference for limited, targeted, or state-driven support.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, well‑targeted funding increase with administrative clarity increases odds, though mandatory CCC funding and lack of offsets create some resistance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes equity and HBCU investment benefits
Modest, well‑targeted funding increase with administrative clarity increases odds, though mandatory CCC funding and lack of offsets create…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To provide additional funding for scholarships for students at…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.