H.R. 1302 (119th)Bill Overview

GRAIN DRY Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill (GRAIN DRY Act) amends the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to make construction or upgrade of propane storage facilities an explicitly eligible use of funds under the Department of Agriculture storage facility loan program. Eligibility is limited to propane primarily used for agricultural production, using the definition in 7 C.F.R. §4279.2 as of enactment.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize climate and fossil-fuel lock-in risks

Watch point

Technically narrow, low controversy, benefits rural producers—likely to attract bipartisan support and committee clearance.

This bill (GRAIN DRY Act) amends the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to make construction or upgrade of propane storage facilities an explicitly eligible use of funds under the Department of Agriculture storage facility loan program.

Eligibility is limited to propane primarily used for agricultural production, using the definition in 7 C.F.R. §4279.2 as of enactment.

The change is a targeted clarification expanding allowable loan purposes for agricultural producers.

Passage60/100

Content is narrow, technical, and low controversy, raising likelihood, but many standalone bills still fail without inclusion in larger packages.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize climate and fossil-fuel lock-in risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEnables farmers to finance construction or upgrades of on‑farm propane storage facilities.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce fuel supply disruptions for operations that rely on propane for drying and heating.
  • Potential benefitCould support rural construction and equipment jobs related to building or upgrading tanks.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExpands federal support for fossil fuel infrastructure, which critics may view as inconsistent with climate goals.
  • Potential burdenAdds potential safety, spill, or accident risks associated with increased on‑farm propane storage.
  • Potential burdenMay impose additional administrative and compliance burdens on USDA and loan applicants.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize climate and fossil-fuel lock-in risks
Progressive30%

Likely cautious or somewhat opposed.

The provision helps rural producers but explicitly supports fossil-fuel infrastructure, which conflicts with climate priorities.

They may accept narrow farm needs but want limits and climate mitigation safeguards.

Likely resistant
Centrist70%

Pragmatic and generally supportive if narrowly tailored.

Sees clear operational benefits for farmers and minor fiscal impacts, but wants accountability, safety standards, and prioritization rules to avoid waste.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive.

Seen as a practical, limited-government change that helps farmers access capital, reduce costs, and strengthen rural economies.

Views it as non-controversial agricultural assistance.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Content is narrow, technical, and low controversy, raising likelihood, but many standalone bills still fail without inclusion in larger packages.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or credit subsidy score provided
  • Whether safety/environmental regulators will raise objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize climate and fossil-fuel lock-in risks

Content is narrow, technical, and low controversy, raising likelihood, but many standalone bills still fail without inclusion in larger pac…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for GRAIN DRY Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis