H.R. 1308 (119th)Bill Overview

FISC Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill creates a Social Security–administered Family Income Supplemental Credit (FISC) that pays monthly cash to qualified pregnant women (after 20 weeks) and to one qualified caregiver per eligible child. Payments are $800 per month for pregnancies, $400 per month for children under 6, and $250 per month for children 6 and older, with a 20% marriage bonus and a phase-out above specified AGI thresholds.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and predictability benefits

Watch point

Substantial policy change with major fiscal implications; could attract cross-interest support but likely divides by ideology and budget concerns.

The bill creates a Social Security–administered Family Income Supplemental Credit (FISC) that pays monthly cash to qualified pregnant women (after 20 weeks) and to one qualified caregiver per eligible child.

Payments are $800 per month for pregnancies, $400 per month for children under 6, and $250 per month for children 6 and older, with a 20% marriage bonus and a phase-out above specified AGI thresholds.

The measure also repeals the federal Child Tax Credit (section 24 of the IRC), makes conforming tax-law edits, requires SSA reporting, creates a Bureau of Family Statistics within SSA, and funds the program by appropriations as necessary, effective starting the first month at least one year after enactment.

Passage20/100

Large programmatic and tax-code overhaul with major cost and partisan salience; historically difficult to enact without broad bipartisan deal or budget reconciliation vehicle.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and predictability benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitDirect monthly cash increases disposable income for pregnant women and caregivers.
  • Potential benefitRegular payments may improve short-term household financial stability and budgeting predictability.
  • Potential benefitHigher prenatal and early-childhood support could improve health and developmental outcomes for children.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRepealing the Child Tax Credit removes an established tax benefit and changes existing household supports.
  • Federal agenciesNet federal spending and long-term budgetary impact depend on offsets and are likely significant.
  • Potential burdenImplementation will increase administrative burden and workload for the Social Security Administration.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and predictability benefits
Progressive80%

Likely broadly supportive because it provides regular cash support to pregnant people and families with young children, aiming to reduce material hardship.

Concerned about the repeal of the Child Tax Credit and whether replacement payments are as generous and reach the same families; will want assurances on benefit reach and adequacy.

Leans supportive
Centrist55%

Mixed view: appreciates targeted monthly assistance and built-in reporting, but is cautious about cost, implementation, and replacing an established tax credit.

Will seek fiscal estimates, clear transition rules, and administrative capacity plans before committing support.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed overall: opposes adding an ongoing federal benefit program and increased SSA responsibilities.

Some conservatives may welcome repeal of the Child Tax Credit, but most will see the bill as a large new entitlement with unclear offsets and administrative expansion.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Large programmatic and tax-code overhaul with major cost and partisan salience; historically difficult to enact without broad bipartisan deal or budget reconciliation vehicle.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or budget score provided
  • Net fiscal offset details besides CTC repeal are unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and predictability benefits

Large programmatic and tax-code overhaul with major cost and partisan salience; historically difficult to enact without broad bipartisan de…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for FISC Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis