Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens who commit sexual assault inadmissible and deportable, and to subject certain such aliens to mandatory detention. It adds sexual-assault convictions or admissions as independent grounds for inadmissibility (212(a)) and deportability (237(a)), and expands mandatory detention criteria at 236(c).
Due process: detention and bond access vs public-safety urgency
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, targeted statutory amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that defines additional grounds for detention, inadmissibility, and deportability based on sexual-assault-related conduct.
The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make aliens who commit sexual assault inadmissible and deportable, and to subject certain such aliens to mandatory detention.
It adds sexual-assault convictions or admissions as independent grounds for inadmissibility (212(a)) and deportability (237(a)), and expands mandatory detention criteria at 236(c).
The bill relies on the statutory definition of “offense involving sexual assault” in section 214(d)(3)(A).
Narrow, enforceable changes increase plausibility, but contentious immigration and due‑process issues and lack of compromise features lower overall chance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, targeted statutory amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that defines additional grounds for detention, inadmissibility, and deportability based on sexual-assault-related conduct. It specifies where in the INA the changes apply and the substantive triggers but leaves procedural, fiscal, and oversight details to existing frameworks without further specification.
Due process: detention and bond access vs public-safety urgency
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Due process: detention and bond access vs public-safety urgency
Supports protecting communities and holding sexual predators accountable, but expresses strong concerns about expanded mandatory detention and the bill's inclusion of mere "admissions." Worries about due process, coerced or ambiguous admissions, family separation, and chilling effects on crime reporting and asylum-seeking.
Would likely push for procedural safeguards and narrow statutory language.
Sees public-safety value in removing sexual predators from the country but wants careful attention to legal clarity, costs, and civil liberties.
Supports targeted enforcement if implemented with clear standards, procedural safeguards, and fiscal transparency.
Likely to seek compromises that preserve both safety and due process.
Views the bill positively as a stronger enforcement measure to protect communities and expel sexual predators.
Emphasizes the need for mandatory detention and clear deportability to prevent reoffending and uphold immigration law.
May press for robust, expedited removal and minimal loopholes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, enforceable changes increase plausibility, but contentious immigration and due‑process issues and lack of compromise features lower overall chance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Due process: detention and bond access vs public-safety urgency
Narrow, enforceable changes increase plausibility, but contentious immigration and due‑process issues and lack of compromise features lower…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, targeted statutory amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that defines additional grounds for detention, inadmissibility, and deportability base…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.