- Potential benefitHelps firms repair or replace property and resume operations more fully.
- Potential benefitMay reduce reliance on higher‑cost private borrowing during recovery.
- Small businessesIncreases available recovery capital for small businesses after disasters.
To amend the Small Business Act with respect to the maximum additional loan amount for certain disaster loans, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
This bill would amend section 7(b)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act to change the maximum additional loan amount for certain disaster loans from 20 percent to 30 percent. The change increases the statutory cap on additional disaster loan amounts available to eligible small businesses.
Liberals stress improved recovery and equity impacts
Narrow, noncontroversial technical fix likely to clear the House with bipartisan support; scheduling remains a variable.
This bill would amend section 7(b)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act to change the maximum additional loan amount for certain disaster loans from 20 percent to 30 percent.
The change increases the statutory cap on additional disaster loan amounts available to eligible small businesses.
The bill text contains no other specified provisions beyond that percentage increase.
Simple statutory increase to a disaster loan cap with modest fiscal effect has relatively high chance; missing budget estimate and prioritization create uncertainty.
How solid the drafting looks.
Liberals stress improved recovery and equity impacts
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesIncreases federal financial exposure by allowing larger disaster loan amounts.
- TaxpayersCould raise taxpayer costs if additional loans lead to higher defaults.
- Potential burdenMay create moral hazard by reducing incentives for private risk mitigation.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals stress improved recovery and equity impacts
Likely supportive as a modest expansion of disaster relief for small businesses, especially those in underserved communities.
Would view this as a concrete step to speed recovery and preserve jobs after disasters, while wanting stronger equity, outreach, and non‑debt relief measures.
Generally favorable as a narrowly tailored adjustment to improve disaster lending flexibility.
Would seek cost estimates, oversight, and a clear administrative plan to avoid unintended fiscal or programmatic problems.
Skeptical: while helping small businesses is a legitimate goal, increasing the federal loan cap raises concerns about taxpayer exposure and moral hazard.
Would prefer market or state-level solutions, tighter underwriting, or offsets.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Simple statutory increase to a disaster loan cap with modest fiscal effect has relatively high chance; missing budget estimate and prioritization create uncertainty.
- CBO/budgetary score and estimated fiscal cost unknown
- Potential increase in federal credit risk from higher loan exposure
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals stress improved recovery and equity impacts
Simple statutory increase to a disaster loan cap with modest fiscal effect has relatively high chance; missing budget estimate and prioriti…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To amend the Small Business Act with respect to the maximum ad…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.