Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The bill authorizes $200 million to $240 million annually for FY2026–2030 to expand and innovate summer youth employment programs. It splits funds between expansion grants, innovation grants, program evaluation, and an Advisory Board, and sets program design requirements, prioritization criteria, and evaluation standards.
Left emphasizes social supports and equity; right emphasizes federal overreach and taxpayer cost.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-scoped statutory authorization for a new federal grant program to expand subsidized summer youth employment, with clear funding levels, program element requirements, prioritized selection criteria, and a significant evaluation and advisory structure.
The bill authorizes $200 million to $240 million annually for FY2026–2030 to expand and innovate summer youth employment programs.
It splits funds between expansion grants, innovation grants, program evaluation, and an Advisory Board, and sets program design requirements, prioritization criteria, and evaluation standards.
Policy is administratively achievable and broadly appealing, but passage hinges on willingness to fund new discretionary spending.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-scoped statutory authorization for a new federal grant program to expand subsidized summer youth employment, with clear funding levels, program element requirements, prioritized selection criteria, and a significant evaluation and advisory structure.
Left emphasizes social supports and equity; right emphasizes federal overreach and taxpayer cost.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes social supports and equity; right emphasizes federal overreach and taxpayer cost.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill funds jobs, targets underserved youth, and includes wrap-around supports and evidence requirements.
They will view it as advancing economic opportunity, educational outcomes, and reducing justice system involvement.
Generally favorable but pragmatic—values targeted assistance, evaluation, and private-sector engagement while worrying about costs, duplication, and administrative burden.
Wants strong accountability and measurable outcomes.
Skeptical of expanded federal spending and new federal program administration; supports youth employment in principle but opposes perceived federal overreach and ongoing taxpayer commitments.
Prefers local control and private-sector solutions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Policy is administratively achievable and broadly appealing, but passage hinges on willingness to fund new discretionary spending.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes social supports and equity; right emphasizes federal overreach and taxpayer cost.
Policy is administratively achievable and broadly appealing, but passage hinges on willingness to fund new discretionary spending.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-scoped statutory authorization for a new federal grant program to expand subsidized summer youth employment, with clear funding levels, program element…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.