H.R. 144 (119th)Bill Overview

Tennessee Valley Authority Salary Transparency Act

Government Operations and Politics|Government employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment information and archives
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Section 9 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act to require the TVA Board to report the total number of management‑level employees and to list names, salaries, and duties of employees paid at or above the maximum GS‑15 rate. It additionally states that the salary information in that report is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3) and from the Access to Congressionally Mandated Reports Act.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize public transparency; conservatives emphasize privacy protections

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a reporting statute that also alters disclosure rules.

The bill amends Section 9 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act to require the TVA Board to report the total number of management‑level employees and to list names, salaries, and duties of employees paid at or above the maximum GS‑15 rate.

It additionally states that the salary information in that report is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3) and from the Access to Congressionally Mandated Reports Act.

The changes create a mandated internal/legislative report while restricting public disclosure avenues for those salary details.

Passage60/100

Short, low‑cost, agency-specific change improves chances; modest controversy over disclosure exemptions reduces but does not preclude enactment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a reporting statute that also alters disclosure rules. It establishes a specific reporting content requirement and creates statutory exemptions from FOIA and the Access to Congressionally Mandated Reports Act, but the operative text is marred by formatting issues and lacks essential implementation details (timing, submission process, definitions, fiscal acknowledgement, and oversight).

Contention62/100

Progressives emphasize public transparency; conservatives emphasize privacy protections

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
SeniorsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • SeniorsProvides Congress and oversight bodies standardized names, salaries, and duties for senior TVA personnel oversight.
  • Potential benefitPreserves this specific compensation report from elimination under the reports-elimination statute.
  • Potential benefitMay enable targeted legislative or budgetary responses informed by consolidated compensation data.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates a statutory exemption that limits public FOIA access to detailed salary information.
  • Potential burdenRaises privacy and potential personal security concerns for listed employees and board members.
  • Potential burdenMay prompt litigation over the scope and interpretation of the FOIA and exemption language.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public transparency; conservatives emphasize privacy protections
Progressive20%

Likely critical.

The persona supports transparency and accountability for public entities, so requiring a report is positive but exempting salary details from public disclosure is concerning.

They will see the exemption as a rollback of public access to executive compensation and a missed opportunity to improve pay equity and public oversight.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed/pragmatic.

The persona will see value in formalizing a report for congressional oversight but will worry that the FOIA and report‑access exemptions are broad and set a risky precedent.

They will weigh oversight benefits against public trust and procedural clarity.

Split reaction
Conservative75%

Generally favorable.

The persona will value oversight while also valuing protections against broad public disclosure that could enable targeting or privacy intrusions.

They will likely accept a report to Congress plus FOIA limits to protect employee privacy and operational security.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Short, low‑cost, agency-specific change improves chances; modest controversy over disclosure exemptions reduces but does not preclude enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Ambiguous wording on FOIA exemption and intended scope
  • Whether disclosure exemption will trigger legal or oversight objections
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Jan 15, 2025
Fast-track passage✓ PassedBipartisanNear-unanimous
2/3 majority required

The House fast-tracked this bill — skipping normal debate — and it passed with a two-thirds majority. It now moves to the Senate.

What is a fast-track passage?

Suspending the rules allows the House to bypass normal debate procedures and pass a bill immediately with a two-thirds vote.

Yes 100% No 0%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public transparency; conservatives emphasize privacy protections

Short, low‑cost, agency-specific change improves chances; modest controversy over disclosure exemptions reduces but does not preclude enact…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a reporting statute that also alters disclosure rules. It establishes a specific reporting content requirement and creates statutory exemptions…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis