H.R. 1502 (119th)Bill Overview

North Platte Canteen Congressional Gold Medal Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill authorizes Congress to award a Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the individuals and communities who volunteered or donated to the North Platte Canteen in North Platte, Nebraska, during World War II (December 25, 1941–April 1, 1946). The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the gold medal, which will be given to the Lincoln County Historical Museum for display; bronze duplicate medals may be struck and sold to cover costs.

Why people may split

All personas broadly supportive; differences mainly on fiscal and precedent concerns

Watch point

Narrow, symbolic, low-cost bill typically attracts broad bipartisan support in the House.

This bill authorizes Congress to award a Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the individuals and communities who volunteered or donated to the North Platte Canteen in North Platte, Nebraska, during World War II (December 25, 1941–April 1, 1946).

The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the gold medal, which will be given to the Lincoln County Historical Museum for display; bronze duplicate medals may be struck and sold to cover costs.

Costs may be charged to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund, and proceeds from bronze sales are deposited into that fund.

Passage85/100

Commemorative, low-cost, administratively clear bills historically clear Congress with minimal opposition; procedural timing is primary barrier.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention12/100

All personas broadly supportive; differences mainly on fiscal and precedent concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides official national recognition for civilian World War II volunteer service.
  • Local governmentsPlaces the medal in a local museum, potentially increasing visitors and local tourism modestly.
  • Potential benefitPreserves a tangible artifact for public display and historical research at the museum.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRequires Mint resources and public enterprise fund outlays for design and striking costs.
  • Potential burdenCould set precedent for additional group medals, raising future administrative and production costs.
  • Potential burdenLocating the medal in one museum may limit nationwide public access to the artifact.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

All personas broadly supportive; differences mainly on fiscal and precedent concerns
Progressive90%

Likely supportive.

The bill recognizes large-scale home-front volunteerism, including the contributions of largely female volunteers, and preserves collective memory in a public museum.

It aligns with values of honoring community service and civilian sacrifice during wartime.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The bill is a narrow, symbolic recognition with limited fiscal impact, but raises routine questions about precedent and cost recovery.

The centrist view will weigh the low cost and bipartisan appeal against setting medal-award precedents.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive but attentive to federal role.

Honoring WWII volunteers and local patriotism is appealing, though there may be reservations about any federal expense and the federal government producing commemorative items.

Preference for minimal ongoing federal involvement.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Commemorative, low-cost, administratively clear bills historically clear Congress with minimal opposition; procedural timing is primary barrier.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or CBO score included
  • Legislative calendar and competing priorities
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

All personas broadly supportive; differences mainly on fiscal and precedent concerns

Commemorative, low-cost, administratively clear bills historically clear Congress with minimal opposition; procedural timing is primary bar…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for North Platte Canteen Congressional Gold Medal Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis