Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
This bill repeals and terminates federal programs that fund electric vehicle (EV) charging and fueling infrastructure established by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). It removes statutory authorization for certain charging and fueling grants, eliminates subsection (f) of 23 U.S.C. §151, rescinds unobligated NEVI program amounts, and bars further funding to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program.
Climate and EV adoption benefits versus desire to cut federal programs
Narrow statutory repeal could pass a chamber sympathetic to the aim, but is ideologically divisive and lacks bipartisan concessions.
This bill repeals and terminates federal programs that fund electric vehicle (EV) charging and fueling infrastructure established by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).
It removes statutory authorization for certain charging and fueling grants, eliminates subsection (f) of 23 U.S.C. §151, rescinds unobligated NEVI program amounts, and bars further funding to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program.
Content is focused but politically charged; may pass a like-minded House but Senate filibuster and stakeholder opposition make enactment unlikely.
How solid the drafting looks.
Climate and EV adoption benefits versus desire to cut federal programs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Climate and EV adoption benefits versus desire to cut federal programs
Likely to oppose the bill strongly.
They would view the repeal as a rollback of federal climate investment and an obstacle to accelerating EV adoption, especially for underserved communities and long-term emissions reductions.
Mixed reaction: concerned about fiscal oversight and federal scope, but wary of disrupting projects and climate commitments.
Would weigh savings and governance concerns against practical impacts on states, contracts, and EV rollout.
Likely to support the bill as a corrective roll-back of federal intervention and spending on EV infrastructure.
They would favor shrinking federal programs and letting market or state solutions prevail.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is focused but politically charged; may pass a like-minded House but Senate filibuster and stakeholder opposition make enactment unlikely.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Climate and EV adoption benefits versus desire to cut federal programs
Content is focused but politically charged; may pass a like-minded House but Senate filibuster and stakeholder opposition make enactment un…
Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Unplug the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Program Act.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.